Standing together: the solidarity of prayer

Like many active Christians living in a pluralistic world, I have taken advantage of several opportunities by which I can grow in understanding of other religious systems, particularly, in the last few years, about Islam. I sat in on a six-week continuing education course we offer on “Introduction to Islam”, and have visited our neighbourhood mosque for several events as well as part of the above-mentioned course. I also know that part of my reflections on being at the mosque for prayers are coloured by the luxury of learning from presentations on liturgical history at different academic conferences. Increasingly, new scholars are drawn to late antique liturgical history in the Middle East, where distinctive forms of Christian liturgy, particularly monastic practices, helped shaped early Islamic practices. The reverse was also true, in which Islamic ritual prayer preserved or re-influenced Christian prayer in the crucial seventh to ninth centuries.

This background shapes my response to one element of Islamic prayer that captures my imagination every time I see it – the physical solidarity of prayer posture in the mosque. Divided by gender, but following the same physical and verbal structures, the Muslim faithful pray in lines facing ‘the direction’ (the Qibla), toward the Kaaba in Mecca. They pray literally shoulder to shoulder, standing, bowing, and kneeling – forehead to the floor – in unity. The effect of watching this from the back of the room is a vision of one body praying throughout the room. These prayers are šalāt, ritual prayers, rooted linguistically in šilat, meaning “connection” or “contact”. Ibn Rushd describes this as saying that “it connects the servant with his Creator, meaning that the prayer brings him near His Mercy and connects him to His Generosity and His Heavenly Paradise.” These prayers are ritual, with “formal requirements and manners, which are essential to its correct observance,” as opposed to the supplicatory prayers, which can occur at any time or place, and represent more of “an open-ended conversation with Allah.”

I think before my more conscious entry into learning about Islam through comparative theology, I had in my mind an aggregate of individuals in Islam praying individually, not corporately, unlike my assumptions about Christian liturgy where the primary prayers are corporate – we pray these prayers as one body, whether voiced out-loud by every individual or spoken by a presider voicing the prayer on behalf of all Christians in the room (and beyond the room). From observation and conversations with faithful Muslims, as well as ongoing study, the corporate sense of prayer has a lot of ritual overlap between Christians and Muslims. Islamic reflection says that prayer “requires the full conscious participation of the one praying, with will, intellect, body and soul.” The current General Instruction on the Roman Missal not only reiterates the classic description that the gathered community be fully engaged so that the liturgy expresses and fosters “the full [and active] participation of the faithful” (1:36) from Sacrosanctum Concilium, but also highlights a common physical participation in corporate prayer: “A common bodily posture, to be observed by all those taking part, is a sign of the unity of the members of the Christian community gathered together for the sacred liturgy, for it expresses the intentions and spiritual attitude of the participants and also fosters them.” (1:42).

The reality in most parishes I’ve been in recently is that an individualistic approach to prayer posture reigns – those who want to kneel, kneel, those who want to stand, stand, those who sit, sit. I was almost startled to be at a Sunday morning mass last week where the posture of standing in solidarity until all have received communion was back in place. I had not seen this in the past 15 years, and the kinesthetic, emotional, and the theological solidarity expressed by the common ritual posture was palpable. Going back to a 1994 book, it was useful to read John Baldovin’s introduction to The Postures of the Assembly during the Eucharistic Prayer (John K. Leonard & Nathan D. Mitchell):

One of the many functions that rituals (and therefore liturgy) perform is to help a group of people experience solidarity, identity and common purpose. And the very reason they need ritual is to express that identity bodily and communally. My point…is to argue that what we do communally with our bodies at worship makes a great deal of difference when it comes to one of the main reasons for public worship in the first place – namely, to express who we are as a community in the presence of the living God. (3)

More recently, James Farwell has written on developing etic descriptions of ritual, searching for a general or universal theory that can cross over religious differences (but always with emic accounts sustaining the uniqueness of each tradition). Farwell says, in the broad sense, ritual functions “as the evocation, through performance, of a universe to inhabit. Those who participate in this performance construct and enter into an “as if” world, a kind of “subjunctive” reality taken to be normative and true…the ritual world is the real world, the actual world that is or will be…” (“Theorizing Ritual for Interreligious Practice”, in Ritual Participation and Interreligious Dialogue, 2015, page 167)

In this blog post, I am not attempting to erase differences between Christianity and Islam or even advocate for interreligious prayer, but I find it helpful to reflect on how a visual and kinesthetic practice embodying an Islamic lex orandi lex credendi may function as a call to reflection on Christian liturgy and the importance of solidarity in body as well as spirit. Tim Winter recounts the contemporary practices of an Anglican nun in Oxford who engages with salat as a “gesture of solidarity and respect, ‘to the extent of learning of God from another tradition.’” She says “a threefold declaration of ‘Glory be to God’ with my body was a real blessing, giving the whole of my body a chance to express itself prayerfully and with movement.” (“Receiving the Stranger” A Muslim Theology of Shared Worship”, also in Ritual Participation, page 84). As Christians, “as aliens and exiles” we enter into an “as if” world, exercising in ritual what will be in the fullness of time. What can we learn from the prayer practices of our Muslim brothers and sisters, who also long for the heavenly paradise of God? How might we be shaped into a greater understanding of the unity of the body of Christ through common posture and prayer? We might even ask first, what might happen if we actually stood next to each other in corporate prayer?




9 responses to “Standing together: the solidarity of prayer”

  1. John Corbyn Avatar
    John Corbyn

    Interesting link between this and the post The Mysteries of Liturgical Sincerity April 26, 2018.
    In my experience German Lutherans all stand to pray.
    Western individualistic subjectivism is undermining of corporate worship which is even seen as coercive.
    I recall attending, as an ordinand, an Anglican Deanery Chapter Eucharist where it hardly seemed that at any point were all observing the same physical posture. That I still remember this some 35 years later shows how disturbing I found it. It seems to me more important that we observe the same posture than what that posture is.

  2. Berthold Kress Avatar
    Berthold Kress

    Just a practical question from a Trad: how should this uniformity work, when about 1/3 of the congregation are families with small children?

  3. Lizette Larson-Miller Avatar
    Lizette Larson-Miller

    Berthold – right, which seems to me a good reason to try this for some prayers. Having been in many pews with our young children, it was the body language, movement, kinesthetic prayer that stuck with our children, rather than words (that and lighting candles..) At the mosque, the kids are right there in the midst of it all doing prayers with their parents – understanding that it’s not all going to be perfect, I think identity through posture at particular times might be actually quite helpful…

  4. Brian Duffy Avatar
    Brian Duffy

    I was very much edified by the prayer rooms, one for the men, one for the women, at the airport of Istanbul back in April. . They were packed with folks making their devotions, bent over and unshod. Moreover men and women were waiting patiently in the hallway to take their places.

    If only the rest of us had such piety!

  5. Philip Sandstrom Avatar
    Philip Sandstrom

    Long ago, when I was in Major Seminary, there was a ‘local joke’ that for prayers ‘we do our public prayers in private, and the private prayers in public’. That is, those bound by the Divine Office recited the Office privately — often pacing the cloister or the corridors while the rest of us had ‘private morning and evening prayers’ done in common. The ‘public devotions’ of prayer in Islam are really ‘private prayers done in public’, much the same as common recitation of the Rosary at Lourdes. Both of these examples are impressive to the onlooker — and to take part in them , but they still are ‘private prayers’ and not ‘public liturgies’

    1. Christopher Lazowski Avatar

      Fr. Bouyer recounts something along the same lines in his memoirs, in the part about his Oratorian formation: everything that should have done in private was done in public, and everything that should have been done in public was done in private. To illustrate this, he describes the novices’ morning meditation in the “salle des exercies” – imagine something as conducive to payer as the average classroom – which the novice master would bring to en end when he heard the community’s superior emptying his chamber pot in the next-door lavatories (the partition was paper thin).
      Although Bouyer wasn’t slow to criticize what he saw as errors in the implementation of Vatican II, he most certainly did not think everything was rosy before the Council. And he wasn’t referring only to the emptying of chamber pots!

      1. Karl Liam Saur Avatar
        Karl Liam Saur

        Which makes me think of the classic English parody of the French critical mind: “That may work in practice, but it does not work in theory.”

    2. Alan Griffiths Avatar
      Alan Griffiths

      I disagree. The fact that the Mosque congregation stands, prostrates, kneels together is what makes this public and liturgical, or ritual, if you prefer. It’s not the content of the prayer itself.

      On another question, it is the cluttering up of churches with seating that is the problem. Children react badly to being cooped up in hard wooden seats, and infants don’t adapt well to the continual sit-and-stand of the contemporary RC Mass. Just watch parents trying to settle babies.

      Churches should have lots of things to do during Mass and lots of places to wander around. Older churches with wide side aisles and side chapels are best adapted for this.


  6. Lizette Larson-Miller Avatar
    Lizette Larson-Miller

    I find the private prayer/public prayer strand interesting – last week a student was asking about private prayer in liturgy, and I found myself searching for a really fine article on the topic of the interweaving of the two (apart from the outward prayer of ritual with our bodies)…I came away empty-handed (actually far less enamoured with Godfrey DIekmann’s small monograph of many years ago now..). Any suggestions related even to the aurality of private and public prayer aside from the incarnate practices?!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: