“Worship is like…” – Thoughts on Root Metaphors

I have been pondering root metaphors lately – those key images and analogies we invoke for the church’s life of faith and worship.  What prompted these reflections was a recent class in which the presenter used the image of “falling in love” to describe his journey of faith.  I cringed.  Not that I do not believe the Triune God to be the ultimate fulfillment of every human desiring.  I have simply heard (and sung) too many worship songs now whose basic theme is a variation of “Jesus is my boyfriend.”  The image of “falling in love with God,” therefore, has become too close to a cliché for me to speak powerfully, in our time.  This is the case not least because our fallings in (and out) of love have multiplied.  “Intimacy with God” when claimed in the mist of this culture – even well before one gets to “hooking up” — evokes other things than it might have done for medieval mystics.

This brings me, somewhat inelegantly, to my larger point, namely root metaphors for the encounter with God at the heart both of faith and of worship.  The liturgical tradition knows a rich set of such root metaphors: from an audience with a Divine King (dominant from the Hebrew Scriptures to many Christian liturgies, East and West), to a mother nursing her child with her own body (present, for example, in early Christian milk-and-honey rituals for the newly-baptized), to the embrace between two lovers.  The latter image thrived not least in the early Liturgical Movement, with some monastic writers in particular envisioning the sanctuary as a “bridal chamber” that Christ enters to be with his beloved Ecclesia.  Each root metaphor calls forth specific postures of faith and worship.  The image of an audience with a Divine King evokes a posture of reverence and awe; the image of two lovers one of passionate union.

A more recent root metaphor for worship has been that of a “dialogue.”  Liturgy is here imagined akin to a conversation between God and God’s people.  As important as this image has been in the second half of the twentieth century, its limitations are considerable.  For one, the image is word-heavy, suggesting that worship is primarily about talking to each other (liturgical logorrhea can ensue).  Consequently, the image privileges those whose capacity for speech is well-developed, while others, e.g., babies, the senile, those who communicate non-verbally or with speech impediments, need not apply.  Finally, in a contemporary culture that is moving from being word-centered to a multi-mediated visuality, the lure of the image of a “dialogue” with God is weakened.

What to do?  Here is what I am not suggesting.  First, I don’t believe we can forego images and metaphors when describing our deepest convictions about worship.  As human beings seeking to articulate faith in a God beyond all human language, we are dependent on metaphors.  Second, I also am not searching for the one perfect metaphor that expresses our experience of what it means to worship the Triune God.  There is no such thing.   Rather, what I am looking for are those metaphors that both capture the Spirit-sustained truth about worship and also speak powerfully in the world in which we live and are called to articulate our faith.  Someone who I think rose to that challenge admirably for her own times was St. Teresa of Avila.  Against a dominant image of prayer as approaching God, the Divine Majesty, in fear and trembling, Teresa posited the image of friendship with God.  And she memorably challenged one of her nuns who desired to pray rather than do the dishes with the insistence that this God “walks among the pots and pans,” that is, the menial domestic labor of women not only their lofty contemplation.  As powerfully as that image spoke into the world of the sixteenth century, we need to find images that do the same but are not the same for the twenty-first century.  What might these compelling images be today?

For me, root images for what it means to enter into God’s presence in worship involve “encounter” — yet they are mostly not human encounters.  I have a sense that “buddy-images” for God – Jesus as boyfriend, or co-pilot – no longer compel.  So, these days, I sometimes envision worship as walking into an ocean of Divine presence, immersing myself so as to drown in divine life.   I sometimes experience worship as touching the deepest mystery at the heart of the universe, as I reach out for the “hem of His garment.”  Sometimes, worship comes to be a way of simply holding utterly still as the Divine Weaver of the Web of Life re-weaves all broken webs into the very life of God.

I am curious about root metaphors for faith and worship that you cherish?  And I would love to know which images you think speak compellingly into our contemporary culture?

 

 

 

 

 

Teresa Berger

Teresa Berger is Professor of Liturgical Studies at the Yale Institute of Sacred Music and Yale Divinity School in New Haven, CT, USA, where she also serves as the Thomas E. Golden Jr. Professor of Catholic Theology. She holds doctorates in both theology and in liturgical studies. Recent publications include an edited volume, Full of Your Glory: Liturgy, Cosmos, Creation (2019), and a monograph titled @ Worship: Liturgical Practices in Digital Worlds (2018). Earlier publications include Gender Differences and the Making of Liturgical History (2011), Fragments of Real Presence (2005), and a video documentary, Worship in Women’s Hands (2007).

Please leave a reply.

Comments

7 responses to ““Worship is like…” – Thoughts on Root Metaphors”

  1. Alan Hommerding

    A number of years ago at the NDCPL summer conference, Pat Malloy gave a presentation on liturgy and Myers-Briggs. The most recent data at the time showed that a majority of Roman Catholics were ST for their central diad, while most people from that group in ministerial leadership were NF. So the root metaphors/images that people at the helm of liturgical language used and found meaningful often did not connect with folks in the pews.
    Whether or not you think Myers-Briggs is accurate/useful, anyone who’s ministered in the church for any stretch of time knows that people encounter and grasp the mystery of faith in a variety of ways. So I think that it’s best to remember that the variety of root metaphors we have are quite a rich blessing, for together they form an entire root system to nourish the faith. So I guess my root metaphor is roots.
    To encounter/use a root metaphor with which I am NOT comfortable is also a way for me to encounter other disciples on the journey, and a way for me to deepen my faith and find greater nurture and nourishment for it.
    For me, this is sort of a corollary to the fruit of the Spirit in Galatians 5. Too often we think that Paul writes about fruitS of the Spirit, but it really is one fruit, with different segments, like citrus fruits have. Different segments of the one fruit of the Spirit, different roots to form the one root system that causes the tree of life to flourish.

    1. John Kohanski

      @Alan Hommerding:
      Unfortunately I can’t agree with you Alan about using metaphors I’m not comfortable with. Teresa’s metaphor of “immersing myself so as to drown in divine life” isn’t something I can handle. I have a fear of water and of drowning. I cringe every year at the Paschal Vigil during the lection of the death of Egyptians in the Red Sea, as well as all the language of plunging and dying in the waters (of Holy Baptism). I’ve had to walk out.

  2. Conor Cook

    I’m curious about how to share these metaphors with the faithful. What are the most effective ways to enrich the liturgical life of faithful who only enter church on Sunday (but are desirous of right worship)?

    I imagine the value of metaphors, specific or in general, varies based on one’s Myers-Briggs letters. I am an NT (though possibly close to ST, apparently), and I have not really considered the metaphorical images I may invoke for my worship. Perhaps I see it more as being in the presence of the Divine King, but not in a metaphorical sense, so that the closeness of the Divine is also an element of my worship.

  3. Anthony Hawkins

    The Divine King is surely “tremendum ET fascinans”. If I recall correctly, well described by Kenneth Grahame in ‘The Wind in the Willows’ Ch 7 ‘The Piper at the Gates of Dawn’.

  4. I don’t associate worship with any particular metaphor. I tend to view worship as a simple matter of justice, paying God the honor and praise due him.

  5. David Muir

    I think it’s important to retain mostly personal rather than impersonal images for God. Hinduism sees the highest expression of the Divine as impersonal, the primordial life force; and so salvation is reabsorption into the Divine, as a drop of water slips into the sea. I think it is problematic imagery, as the individual is ‘lost’ rather than redeemed. All our talk of reconciliation, love, trust etc in relation to God breaks down if the Divine is not personal.

    But I entirely agree with your hesitations about ‘in love’ terminology, not least because of the gender stuff. I have found it helpful to relate to God as plural, and worship as entering (with others) into the Divine community. I never know which of the Trinity to address in prayer anyway… and plurality softens the gender associations. We tie ourselves in knots over the Trinity because we assume that the kind of person I am as a human being is normal, and God is some kind of complicated variant on that. Of course, the opposite must be true: that the kind of ‘personal’ that God is is normal, and each of us is a mere fragment of that reality. But given that our ‘personhood’ is the highest form of life in Creation, God cannot be less than that. It’s fine to have other metaphors for God, but I don’t think that God being personal or a Trinity of persons is meant to be a metaphor in Christian theology. We mustn’t limit Them, but They can be no less than personal, however dim a reflection of that each of us is.

    From a liturgical point of view, it is hard to give expression to such thoughts. What language do you use to address a God who is neither masculine nor feminine, neither singular nor plural, but also encompasses all these things? But the ‘plurality’ of God would I think lend itself to your feeling of being a small part of a large tapestry, because coming into the conscious presence of a Plural God is a bit like coming as an individual into a rich human community, into which you are lovingly assumed and received.

  6. Angie Sickler

    You talk of worship metaphors without listing even one place in scripture. Disappointing.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading