Women, Baptism, and the Post-Vatican II Church

As Lent enters its final phase and the Paschal Triduum draws near, I thought it might be timely to share a talk I gave at Fairfield University a little more than a year ago: โ€œBecome Who You Are: Women, Baptism, and the Post-Vatican II Church.โ€

It deals mainly with the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults, and how the reform of baptism โ€“ and indeed the rediscovery of baptism in its fullness —ย remains a vital aspect of the renewal of the Church today, โ€œfrom the bottom up.โ€

Part of what I wanted to point out was the radical equality of women and men embodied in the central expressions of our baptismal tradition. A profound commonality unites us, and needs to be affirmed and treasured as part and parcel of the โ€œnew identityโ€ we take on in Christ (see Galatians 3:28). This heritage is important, yet I find it is easily overlooked.

I also wanted to lift up the existence of numerous female referents in the Paschal Vigilโ€”another instance of a rich aspect of the tradition, too often neglected:

Our baptismal tradition is laced through with female symbolism and imagery. As I have studied the Easter Vigil in particular, I am struck by how many artful examples of this there are, to say nothing of the female referents in the visual arts and scriptures traditionally associated with baptism in Christian history. ย Some of this tradition has been suppressed. But other elements remain . . .

Most of all, I wanted to voice a concern that, after a promising beginning in the reform of Christian initiation, we are experiencing today โ€œa certain stagnation of our collective imagination concerning baptism, a sclerosis in our ability to take the gains of the Council concerning baptism and translate them into meaning for ourselves and into passion for what they represent and could mean for the Church.โ€

A panel of respondents followed the talk. Given the many issues raised, it became clear that we have much work to do. One of the respondents, animated by interest in some of the observations I made about baptismal fonts, went looking for a font in her church. She had to look for it! She then attended an infant baptism, to which the family and guests paid almost no attentionโ€”a fact which plainly shocked her. There you have it. That is the status of baptism, still, in many places.

Yet there is hope, because all the good potential of our baptismal polity remains here, waiting to be discovered. And it contains nothing less than the excitement and promise of the whole Christian life:

The dynamics of Christian life itself are what shape our rites of initiation: Opening up the scriptures, walking the way of faith with companions on the journey, discovering Christ in our midst, recognizing him in the breaking of the bread, and going forth to announce the good news that โ€œhe is alive.โ€

These dynamics, ritualized and celebrated in a believing community, cannot fail to change us.

[An edited and abbreviated version of the talk also appeared in the September 28, 2015 issue of Commonweal magazine, as “Late to the Font: Whatever Happened to Adult Baptism?”]

Rita Ferrone

Rita Ferrone is an award-winning writer and frequent speaker on issues of liturgy and church renewal in the Roman Catholic tradition. She is currently a contributing writer and columnist for Commonweal magazine and an independent scholar. The author of several books about liturgy, she is most widely known for her commentary on Sacrosanctum Concilium (Liturgy: Sacrosanctum Concilium, Paulist Press). Her most recent book, Pastoral Guide to Pope Francis's Desiderio Desideravi, was published by Liturgical Press.

Please leave a reply.

Comments

6 responses to “Women, Baptism, and the Post-Vatican II Church”

  1. Bill deHaas

    Thank you, Rita – have forwarded to our parish RCIA team.

  2. Joshua Vas

    I enjoyed reading the article. A couple of things occurred to me:

    – I felt the article gave the impression that the signing of the cross and immersion were restorations from ancient rites, whereas it is perhaps the explanatory note that is the novelty. The old Rituale Romanum, even before it was allowed to split the rite into stages, prescribed the signing of the candidates. In the United States (as in certain other places), part of the reason why it might have been rare was the practice of using the indult for baptizing adults using the rite of infant baptism. Similarly, while I would concede that there has been a strong and welcome focus on immersion in the reformed rites, nonetheless immersion was always mentioned and instructions provided in the older Roman Ritual (which technically also required places practicing immersion to continue doing so).

    – I think the idea of backlash has become too common. In fact, perhaps ironically, the Council itself (and one’s interpretation of it – which is not to say that the interpretation is not correct) becomes an authority that cannot be questioned. Certainly there are people who adopt earlier practices without question or for silly reasons, and people who reject off-offhandedly newer developments, etc. But it has become too convenient, I think, to simply dismiss objections as reaction against a kind of glorious, forward thinking and propelling movement. To give an example: I, for one, don’t think that fidelity to Latin originals (in the abstract — not speaking about the new translations) and a reining in of some inculturation has been a bad thing. I think (perhaps obviously!) that I have decent reasons for holding to this idea. Similarly, I don’t think that some of our liturgical changes have been successful or even helpful. I would hope that there might be a discussion on the reasons why I hold this, and not a generalizing backsweep into an obstructionist camp along with every other conceivable objector.

  3. Joshua Vas

    – Regarding pre-conciliar and post-conciliar catechetics: aside from the subtle implication that “male” instruction = content heavy, overly intellectual, dominating/preaching vs. “female” instruction = sharing, individual, sympathetic approaches, I think the idea is rather simplistic. It may be that women wrote the texts and gave the instruction – fine: however,the problem (in the very least for some people – I will grant that others may have subconscious reactions) is not with the sex or gender, but with the teaching. Immediately setting it up as a reaction against female empowerment in the Church does not strike me as being quite fair to the concerns expressed. (This is not to say that I think that content-heavy approaches are all that successful either – but I don’t want to wander into the larger question of what forms the components of effective teaching)

  4. Rob Spaulding

    Thank you, Rita. I am grateful for your scholarship and passion. Now to begin thinking of ways to share your wisdom with Wyoming.

  5. Mary Wood

    A local “free” church (URC) practises both Infant Baptism, with a cupful of water, and adult Believer’s Baptism by full immersion, hiring the swimming pool for the occasion. Last year however, a woman aged c50 was baptised in the church, in a birthing pool. A very powerful symbol for the entire congregation.

  6. Rita, thank you. I read the Commonweal piece and I am now grateful for this today.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading