Viewpoint: Broken Reeds, Smoldering Wicks, and the Church’s Ministry

by M. Francis Mannion

Every time we come to the Solemnity of the Baptism of the Lord, I think of one of my favorite scriptural passages taken from the prophet Isaiah. God’s servant, the prophet declares, brings forth justice “not crying out, not shouting, not making his voice heard in the street.” And in powerful words, the passage says of God’s servant: “A bruised reed he shall not break, and a smoldering wick he shall not quench.”

Applied to the Church today, the fundamental message is that the role of God’s servants is not to preach hell fire and damnation to broken people, to make them walk away with a sense that the Church does not care, or even rejects them. The role of God’s servant is to bring encouragement and hope to those who are broken, bruised, and discouraged.

The “bruised reed” is a good image of human vulnerability and frailty. In the world of nature, the bruised reed, if tended gently, still grows and thrives in the proper environment, even if with difficulty; but in a harsh environment the bruised reed breaks and dies.

Christians are called to treat the bruised reeds among their brothers and sisters with gentleness and care, so that they may thrive and grow, and not spiritually fade and die.

The “smoldering wick” in Isaiah is also a potent image of faith and hope on the very edge of being quenched. With gentleness and patient care, the smoldering wick can be rekindled; but with rough, careless, and overbearing treatment it is quenched.

The world, the Church, our congregations, our households are full of bruised reeds whom we should not break, but raise up again; smoldering wicks we must not quench, but help rekindle.

Those who serve in the pastoral ministry of the Church have a particular responsibility in this regard. When bishops, priests, and deacons are seen as harsh, quick to judge, unfeeling, and unsympathetic—then they are miserable failures.  Unless a pastor is seen as one to whom one can go and expect care, compassion, and gentleness, he is betraying his ministry.

In the recent Synod of Bishops in Rome, the participants struggled with how to deal with the sense of alienation and isolation from the Church among homosexuals, those in homosexual unions, and the families of homosexuals. Some bishops offered courageous proposals in this regard.

On this matter overall, the Synod took two steps forward and one-and-a-half steps backward. But the Synod participants were left with the sense that something must be done to include homosexual persons and other sexual minorities in the Church. There was a felt need for a new language about sexual matters, rather than the simple repetition of traditional formulas, which fail to compel—and still remain quite untouched by Vatican II.

A similar concern was expressed about the possibility that those who are presently unable to receive Communion because they are in second marriages without an annulment could receive holy Communion. Going to Mass without receiving the Eucharist is for such people a most unsatisfactory experience, and I expect that the final document from the Synod that Pope Francis will issue will take positive steps in this regard.

The ordinary Catholic does not have to wait until the Church speaks more positively on thorny matters. The vocation to uphold and strengthen the alienated and marginalized can be carried on now for the most part quietly, unobtrusively, and undramatically. There is not one of us who lacks the ability to carry out the vocation of God’s gentle, healing servant.

Msgr. Mannion is pastor emeritus of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church in Salt Lake City. Reprinted by permission of Catholic News Agency.

Francis Mannion

Please leave a reply.

Comments

18 responses to “Viewpoint: Broken Reeds, Smoldering Wicks, and the Church’s Ministry”

  1. This.is.wonderful! Thank you.

  2. Holly Renz

    What a beautiful reflection. This should be taken to heart by all in ministry, and I will certainly be keeping your thoughts in mind as I go about my work in my own parish. Thank you!

  3. Msgr. Manion’s writing helped inspire my doctoral dissertation. Always very happy to read what he has to say.

  4. Jason R. Lewis

    Outstanding. Thank you.

  5. Excellent and inspirational.

  6. Clay Zambo

    Hear, hear!

  7. Steve Woodland

    Bravo, Monsignor, Bravo!

  8. Anna Kovalcik

    Amen. Thank you!

  9. Jay Edward

    Telling people in gravely sinful situations to present themselves to Holy Communion is not doing them any favors.

    1. @Jay Edward:
      In some instances persons in second marriages are not in gravely sinful situations.

      Regarding those who present themselves for the reception of the Eucharist, we may need a deeper recognition of God’s grace working through the sacraments. For all believers. Sinners certainly need nourishment. They also need an awareness of the notion of sacrifice, of the need for the imitation of Christ, and an impulse to a path toward the cooperation with the perfection God intends for human beings. If the reception of the Eucharist assists in this, so much the better.

      1. Jay Edward

        @Todd Flowerday:

        Sure, if somebody’s first spouse passed on, or there the first marriage wasn’t a valid one to begin with.

        And recieving the Eucharist while in mortal sin is sacrelige.

  10. Bill deHaas

    Thank you, Todd. Suggest we need to understand eucharist – to start, as food for the journey; not as a reward for individual good behavior. That changes the paradigm fundamentally along with your ecclesiology.

    1. Jay Edward

      @Bill deHaas:

      Except that the person is likely to interpret the reception of the Eucharist as the sanctioning of their situation, instead of something that will lead them to turn from sin.

  11. This Viewpoint is a true Epiphany gift – thank you!

  12. Theresa Maccarone

    Terrific!

  13. Alan Johnson

    The problem I have with the mortal sin viewpoint is that it sees sex as the be all and end all of a relationship. Nothing else is worth considering when put up against it. Not the things that led to a previous marriage failing, and not the positives in a new relationship. The whole thing is reduced to sex.
    Married people know otherwise.

    1. @Alan Johnson:
      Agreed. I think the obsession with sex is a problem as the Church attempts to articulate an otherwise good impulse about worthiness, and encourage the journey to perfection. There was a time when the Church had a much sterner approach to murder, and returning soldiers were steered into the order of penitents. Today, we supply chaplains and bishops, and killing others is judged “just” by certain standards.

      Two additional problems pop up. First, the impression that believers can make themselves worthy for the sacramental life. In this instance, by adopting celibacy. Second, it would seem the actions and teachings of the Lord mitigate against a rigorist approach to grace. The Church hasn’t always taken this approach. We don’t have canons that address church discipline for many sins. Perhaps we should dispense with the terms “adultery” and “serious sin” and leave it to believers and their confessors.

      1. Alan Johnson

        @Todd Flowerday:
        And neither do we have minute ecclesiastical prescriptions surrounding Jesus command to feed the hungry, visit those in prison and clothe the naked.
        Maybe people should be denied the sacraments if they fiddle their taxes or campaign in support of the death penalty.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading