Ars Praedicandi: Throwing Out Your Homily

Having reflected on the Sunday readings in the first part of the week, I typically like to set about writing down ideas for a homily on Thursday, producing a draft on Friday, and revising it Saturday morning. I often find that one or more ideas in the homily,ย to which I was indissolubly wedded on Friday, seem less important on Saturday morning, allowing me to craft a somewhat briefer and more tightly-focused homily. But occasionally, as was the case this week, Saturday rolls around and I find that I need to throw out the entire, nearly-finished homily I had been working on all week and start afresh. Sometimes this is because of something that happens: a world event or, as in one case, a heart-felt question asked of me byย an RCIA candidate about sexual abuse in the Church that I feltย deserved an answer in a public forum like a homily.

This week, however, it was more a matter of an interior movement of the Spirit (or at least I hope it was the Spirit; we’ll see what the fruits are). I had spend the week developing thoughts on mercy (which is our common homiletic focus for Advent) in light of the Sunday readings and had produced what I thought was a nice theological reflection on three “moments” of divine mercy: our creation, our calling to eternal life with God, and our forgiveness in Christ. In the course of working on this I was perusing the writings of Catherine of Siena, who has some wonderful things to say on God’s mercy. One line that had made it into the homily was from chapter 13 of theย Dialogue, where she speaks of how we have โ€œdeclared war on [Godโ€™s] mercyย and become [Godโ€™s] enemies,โ€ then going on to say that in Christ God has, โ€œ[given] this warring human race a way to reconciliation,ย bringing great peace out of our war.โ€ In the homily as it stood on Friday evening this was more or less a throwaway line, somewhat tangential to the homily.

But over the course of Friday night and Saturday morning Catherine’s words began to nag at me. Particularly as I heard and read more news reports about the shootings in San Bernardino, read some Facebook posts from parishioners about the distress they felt over these events, followed some debates about “prayer shaming”, I kept thinking about Catherine’s statement that we humans had declared war on God’s mercy. I felt a moral obligation to address as best I could the various ways in which we make war on God’s mercy and how prayer addresses the violence of our world on a level deeper than any policy reforms, as important as they may be. So on Saturday morning, I threw out the homily that I had been developing all week and produced this homily instead.

As is obvious from the text I have linked, I write my homilies out in full and deliver them pretty much as written (people tell me that they do not come across as “read,” but I am more or less reading the text). This allows me to be precise with my wording and frees me to speak in a somewhat more “elevated” tone than if I were formulating the words on the fly from bullet points on an outline. Based on the feedback I get, it works for me. But one of the dangers, I think, of putting in the time to write out a homily in full is that it can make you less willing to throw it out. For that matter, whether written-out or not, any good homily takes hours of preparation, and the more time spent the more difficult it is to abandon. But part of being an effective homilist is precisely this willingness to abandon your hours of careful work to respond to events and to the Spirit’s prompting.

Fritz Bauerschmidt

I am a professor of Theology at Loyola University Maryland and a permanent deacon of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, assigned to the Cathedral of Mary Our Queen.

Please leave a reply.

Comments

8 responses to “Ars Praedicandi: Throwing Out Your Homily”

  1. Bill deHaas

    Deacon Fritz – thank you!!! Back in the good ole days, used your method to do homilies also (with exceptions such as weddings, funerals, etc. where I knew the folks well).

    Good food for thought (comment – my fault was that I probably would have been more direct and directive towards the end or even ended with a question or cry (prophet like)

  2. I’m not sure your experience is an argument for not writing a homily out in full. I’m often telling students that they finally have written themselves to their starting point in the last paragraph of their drafts. Perhaps if we viewed writing (homilies or otherwise) as a chance first to try out ideas, to sieve our thoughts, rather than as a communicative tool, we’d be less worried about tossing it. Even the word “essay” has as its roots “to try out”.

    I’m caught, too, by the voice of Catherine of Siena here, so thank you for this tiny homily.

  3. Karl Liam Saur

    Deacon Fritz,

    I would suggest that this is very much about deep preparation, not spontaneity. It’s contemplative, rather than ad hoc. If you hadn’t done the writing, this might well have never happened. (And I am delighted you didn’t include any of this process in your actual homily.)

  4. Fritz, thanks for this. It is well put. I’ve been many times myself. I agree with the importance of preparing. While I don’t write my homilies word for word, I do prepare in depth beginning with Sunday evening and ending with a firm plan by Thursday, leaving room for fine tuning. Due to events as late as last night, today’s homilies will be different from last evening’s. I really hope I am responding to the Spirit.

  5. Lee Bacchi

    “Prayer shaming” is not discouraging prayers or asserting that prayer is useless. In this situaiton, members of Congress (mostly Repubicans) were sending thoughts and prayers and making no effort to deal with gun control And then they vote to allow folks on the “no-fly” list the ability to purchase guns and assault weapons. The prayer shaming was a way to get people moved to effective action as well as prayer.

  6. Jim Pauwels

    Fritz, many thanks for this post – and for your stunning homily.

    I was scheduled to preach on the evening of the Saturday when now-Saint John Paul II died. Like you and others, I prepare throughout the week, draft a few days ahead, and then polish. In that case, I had to tear up the pages and start from scratch. If I had had to work that afternoon, rather than having the time to do a complete homily rewrite, I’d never have been able to talk about JPII in a way that did him justice – I probably would have given the original homily, perhaps prefaced with a few words acknowledging the pope’s death.

  7. Fritz, thank you for this. I was offering a scriptural reflection at evening prayer on Tuesday of last week and was all set to go. Except for that on Tuesday morning a persistent thought kept crying out for my attention in the pre-dawn hour when I awakened.

    So throw it all out I did, and what felt like flying by the seat of my pants turned out to be flying by the grace of the Holy Spirit. At least that is what it seems based on feedback that I trust.

    And your homily, thank you, so brilliantly put. Amen.

  8. Peter Rehwaldt

    In my almost 30 years of preaching, I too have had those occasions when I’ve thrown out what I had spent the week preparing because of events that have taken place late in the week. Sometimes they are big things that have gripped the attention of the world – the culmination of the Tienanmen Square protests on June 4, 1989 (which was Saturday, June 3, in Chicago where I watched events unfold on live tv) comes immediately to mind as one example. Other times they are a very local thing that has happened, like the unexpected death on a Saturday morning of a beloved leader of the parish.

    Looking back on those occasions, what stands out to me is that while I may have thrown out the specific direction I had intended on going, all the preparation that I had done was not just still needed, but absolutely necessary to make a last-minute pivot and change in direction. I do not make such drastic, last-minute changes lightly, but when they are necessary, I know that all the work done earlier in the week will allow me to do so, so that God’s word can be heard.

    I’ve also experienced the painful experience of a time when the preacher did *not* change their sermon at a time that the community was consumed by events. When I was a seminary student, one of the school’s favorite professors had a sabbatical that he spent in Eastern Europe doing some historical research. While he was there, word began to emerge that there had been a nuclear accident in Chernobyl, and that radiation was now moving west over Europe. When our seminary community gathered for Eucharist on Wednesday, everyone was worried about our absent professor. In the homily that day, however, the preacher had not a mention of Chernobyl at all. He went ahead with the sermon he had prepared, before the news reached the West, leaving me and most of the community at a loss. We had come seeking peace in the midst of fear, and found nothing. It might have been a fine sermon under “normal” conditions, but that day was anything but normal, and demanded something more.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading