Pope Francis’ Crozier

Pope Francis celebrated a special liturgy of thanksgivingย in the Church of the Gesรน in Romeย today to mark the 200th anniversary of the restoration of the Society of Jesus. An alert Pray Tell reader writes in toย alertย usย that Pope Francis used a bishop’s crozier for the liturgy – see the entrance procession at around 6:40.

Popes at one time used a bishop’s crozier, but this had disappeared by the thirteenth century, when Pope Innocent III wrote, โ€œThe Roman Pontiff does not use the shepherd’s staff.โ€

Later in the Middle Ages, popes began using the ferula, a staff with a crossย of one bar, or sometimes three, as a sign of their temporal power and governance.ย Theย ferula soon died out, until it was revised in the late 19th century under Pius IX. After a few more ups and downs, under Paul VI the ferula became a standard pieceย for liturgical use, the pope’s version of the bishop’s crozier. Benedict XVI caused a sensation (at least among people who observe such things – I usually missย them)ย when he revivedย the ferula of Pius IX.

To be sure, Leo XIII occasionally used a crozier shaped like other bishops’. But that’s a rare exception in papal history. For over a century, bishops have used croziers, but popes have used ferulae. Until today.

Anthony Ruff, OSB

Fr. Anthony Ruff, OSB, is a monk of St. John's Abbey. He teaches liturgy, liturgical music, and Gregorian chant at St. John's University School of Theology-Seminary. He is widely published and frequently presents across the country on liturgy and music. He is the author of Sacred Music and Liturgical Reform: Treasures and Transformations, and of Responsorial Psalms for Weekday Mass: Advent, Christmas, Lent, Easter. He does priestly ministry at the neighboring community of Benedictine sisters in St. Joseph.

Please leave a reply.

Comments

23 responses to “Pope Francis’ Crozier”

  1. Also, deacon stoles worn OVER the dalmatic: maybe a Jesuit thing?

  2. David J Wesson

    What will be neat is to see will this become a norm for him… He has adopted the pallium like a metropolitan wears rather than a “papal” pallium. So would it not follow he adopts the pastoral staff of a “normal bishop?”

    1. Todd Orbitz

      @David J Wesson – comment #2:
      He went back to the practice of John Paul II and Benedict (at the beginning of his pontificate). Marini, who soon will head CDW had created an older version of the pallium to mimic the type the Pope wore around 900-1100 AD. It was seen as somewhat ecumenical. Benedict did not like it, and left it on the tomb of Pope Celestine V (who also resigned the munus). Benedict then adopted a much more traditional pallium, but differentiated it a little bit because he did not want to completely offend Marini — who by that time had left Rome.

  3. Sean Whelan

    It looks similar to the one he had while still Cardinal Bergoglio – Google the Cardinal and you’ll see.

  4. Stanislaus Kosala

    I just wanted to point out that John Paul II used a bishops crosier once so this isn’t the first time a pope has done so in over a century.
    Here is a link: http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/6026/000ferula3.jpg

    1. George Hayhoe

      @Stanislaus Kosala – comment #4:
      If I’m reading the Italian caption correctly, JPII is using St Charles Borromeo’s crozier in that photo at a celebration honoring the saint.

      1. Stanislaus Kosala

        @George Hayhoe – comment #6:
        You’re right, but at the same time we don’t know Francis’ motivation for using the crozier yesterday. I think Father Anthony is making too much out of this. Notice how Guido Marini wasn’t present and so maybe the pope didn’t have anyone bring a ferula and the pope want something to support himself when he walked. Also, today Francis used Benedict’s gold ferula (modeled on the one used by Pius IX), so it’s not a change in papal liturgy.

      2. Anthony Ruff, OSB Avatar
        Anthony Ruff, OSB

        @Stanislaus Kosala – comment #8:
        Stanislaus, I’m not trying to make too much out of this, nor am I speculating on Francis’ motivations. I’m just reporting on what happened. It seems like you don’t want to see a change in papal liturgy – maybe that’s your problem? Pray Tell will report on what it wants for those who chose to come here.

        What Francis did today with a gold ferula is an entirely different matter and does nothing to affect whether what he did yesterday is a change in papal liturgy.

        awr

      3. Stanislaus Kosala

        @Anthony Ruff, OSB – comment #11:
        It’s not a change in papal liturgy in that it does not seem to signal that Francis wants to replace the ferula and revert to a crozier in the same manner that he reverted to the standard pallium. That’s why it is relevant that he used Benedict’s ferula today. Praytell can report whatever it wants, though it’s better when it gets it’s facts straight. This isn’t the first time in over a century that a pope has used a crozier, just the first time in 30 years.

  5. Alan Johnson

    A strange shape for a crozier. Had it seen a ghost?

  6. David J Wesson

    Also, I think it would be relevant to determine whether the JP2 picture was a Roman Rite liturgy or one of the Milanese Rite. If it was Milanese then Francis would still be doing something unique.

  7. At about 1:25:00 in the video, when the pope received the “pastoral staff” for the final blessing, it is evident that there is some sculpture above the knob and below the partial crook. When I saw this staff, I too wondered whether it was a new papal ferula or a bishop’s staff/crozier, but I also wondered if the sculpture is some sort of image of the risen Christ, facing in the same direction as the crook, thus making it more of a ferula. Until we see a close-up picture, it’ll be hard to tell!

  8. Fergus Ryan

    What’s more interesting, for me, is the lack of a Magnificat in the “Vespers” and enthroning the open Gospel book on the altar after the Gospel reading and the explanation in the booklet being “so that it may illuminate the rest of our celebration”. It have no idea what that means. Here is a link to the booklet – http://sjweb.info/documents/2014Restoration/libretto12.pdf

    1. Joshua Vas

      @Fergus Ryan – comment #10:
      I wonder how that designation came about – the booklet itself, as far as I could see, use the generic “Liturgy” to describe the celebration. It seemed to be based on a ‘Celebration of the Word’ (or ‘Bible service’) pattern.

    2. Felix Diaz

      @Fergus Ryan – comment #10:
      It is my understanding that this is not a vesper service but a service of thanksgiving. Therefor there would be no set rules as such.

  9. Charles Macnamara

    Perhaps the intention would be from now on to use the crozier while doing ‘Bishop of Rome’ things — such as visits to parishes and churches in Rome (like the Chiesa di Gesu) — and to use the ferula when doing more ‘universal’ things — such as trips outside Rome and celebrations at the Vatican (like the recent Mass with the elderly)?

    That’s just some speculation of course — we’ll have to wait and see if he will use the crozier again and in what circumstances.

    1. David J Wesson

      @Charles Macnamara – comment #14:
      Would that not be a sign of a (false) dichotomy between the universal ministry of the Bishop of Rome and the local ministry of the Bishop of Rome? Surely, one could not separate the universal from its source (the local).

  10. Peter Pearson

    I think you all need to get out more. Just sayin’.

  11. Johann Christian

    It seems that the REAL liturgical significance of this event is not who did or did not hand the pope what staff, or how quickly I can avow the moral highground of whether this does-or-does-not-matter-TO-ME…

    I think the real liturgical significance is the use of the solemn recitation of the Te Deum as a liturgy for thanksgiving. Certainly this is a liturgical custom which has died out in the English-speaking world. Is it still common in Italy? Is it something Bergoglio brings from the annual New Year’s ceremony in Buenos Aires?

    Surely that is the interesting part of this story.

  12. There are some interesting variables here. Is this crozier from the Vatican collection or a personal crozier Pope Francis brought over from Buenos Aires? Is the crozier a gift? It’d be interesting to find out.

  13. Richard Skirpan

    I also wonder how much of the decision-making in this instance has to do with him being with his Jesuit confreres.

  14. joseph mangone

    I personally feel that a pope, as a bishop, metropolitian, etc should use a simple crozier/staff as seen on this video. He is above all a shepherd, who calls us to be close to the sheep. The days of using anything to represent temporal power is over……

    1. Dewie Gaul

      @joseph mangone – comment #21:
      Yes indeed, the days ‘are’ over, and I hink the Church is better oof without the Papal States. Does anyone disgree?


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading