Liturgical notes on the new Archbishop of Chicago [2 updates]

It has been in the news that Blase Cupich, Bishop of Spokane, Washington, will be the next Archbishop of Chicago. The Associated Press report notes that

Pope Francis’ choice for Chicago has been closely watched as his first major appointment in the U.S., and the clearest indication yet of the direction he will steer American church leaders.

Upon hearing news of Bishop Cupich’s appointment, I was aware that much of the reportage would concern matters such as his handling of the sex abuse crisis or his views on politics or his stands on a number of controversial issues.

But what about liturgy?

Looking around on line, I found only a few indications of his style and thought.

Here is a video of him presiding at an NCEA liturgy in 2013. Skillful, low-key, at home in the rites.

He wrote a Pastoral Letter while bishop of Rapid City, South Dakota, with this intriguing title: โ€œHe Comes to Be with Us Because He Knows We Are Dying: A Christmas Message on the Importance of the Eucharist in Our Lives, A Pastoral Letter to the People of God in Western South Dakota in the Year of the Eucharistย (2004).โ€ Unfortunately, I was not able to find the text on line.

I did, however, find the text of theย Habinger lecture he delivered at the College of St. Thomas, in St. Paul, MN, in 2003. It was entitled:ย โ€œThe Second Vatican Council: Why should it matter to your generation.โ€ He speaks only parenthetically about liturgy, but clearly links a reinvigorated theology of the Church as communion to the reform of the liturgy:

โ€ฆ[T]his emphasis on the communal nature of the Church opened up a much richer understanding of the liturgy. Now our worship of God becomes a renewal of the bonds we share with each other, and with Christ, as we take up His mission of reconciling all of creation through the blood of His Cross. The Church grows in this identity and mission through the Eucharist. That is why the Council called for full, active and conscious participation in the liturgy. It is not for building our own small group or social enclave of like-minded or like-income people. Rather, it is about Christ drawing us together to renew us in our identity and to reinvigorate us for the mission. It is no wonder that the Council Fathersโ€™ first task was the renewal of the liturgy. In fact, The Constitution on the Liturgy was their first document, issued forty years ago this coming December 4.11 The renewal of the liturgy was aimed at building the kind of community we have been talking aboutโ€ฆ

It’s a lecture well-worth reading to get a sense of the man and his perspective. When he speaks about the Council’s unfinished agenda at the end, he comes out sounding very much like Pope Francis in reaching out to non-believers:

We are still learning how to speak with those who rejectย the Gospel. Open and mature dialogue is never easy, but the strength and patience itย demands will keep us from the two extremes, a quick condemnation of those at odds with us or an easy compromise of our own position so that we fit in. This is true in dialogue with people of other faiths and traditions or with politicians and elected officials.

This part of the Churchโ€™s agenda is a work in progress, but it needs to go forward if the Church is going to be true to her identity as a servant to the world, not against the world or of the world but for the world.

[Update: My thanks to Anthony Ruff for noting the Cruxย article which reported Cupich had a clash with Latin Mass enthusiasts in Rapid City; he barred them from celebrating the liturgies of Holy Week in the extraordinary form.ย My thanks to Ricky Manalo for commenting below that Cupich has a doctorate in liturgy at Catholic U, which is excellent news indeed. Another source tells me his dissertation adviser was the much esteemed David Power.]

Chicago has given the American Church notable leadership in liturgy in the past. Institutions such as Liturgy Training Publications, and ministries such as the Office of Divine Worship have made lasting contributions to liturgical renewal beyond the borders of the Archdiocese. Let us hope that their new ordinary will support these and other worthwhile endeavors during his tenure, lending his own “style and grace” to the liturgy of a great diocese.

In closing, here is a picture of Bishop Cupich baptizing a catechumen at the Easter Vigil, in 2010.

cupich-vigil

[second update] I’m informed by another source that the episcopal ring Cupich is wearing in the photo below is one of the rings that Pope Paul VI gave the bishops at the end of the Second Vatican Council (or a copy; they are still made in some shops in Rome). It is one of the least expensive episcopal rings, yet one which suggests a wealth of meaning. From all accounts, the signs are clear that Bishop Cupich prizes the heritage of Vatican II, in the liturgy and otherwise. Congratulations, Chicago!

Cupich ring

Rita Ferrone

Rita Ferrone is an award-winning writer and frequent speaker on issues of liturgy and church renewal in the Roman Catholic tradition. She is currently a contributing writer and columnist for Commonweal magazine and an independent scholar. The author of several books about liturgy, she is most widely known for her commentary on Sacrosanctum Concilium (Liturgy: Sacrosanctum Concilium, Paulist Press). Her most recent book, Pastoral Guide to Pope Francis's Desiderio Desideravi, was published by Liturgical Press.

Please leave a reply.

Comments

17 responses to “Liturgical notes on the new Archbishop of Chicago [2 updates]”

  1. Ricky Manalo

    In addition: “Within the archdiocesan curia of Omaha, he served as director of the Office for Divine Worship . . . He completed his graduate studies at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. Cupich obtained his licentiate (1979) and later doctorate of Sacred Theology (1987) in Sacramental Theology, with a dissertation entitled: Advent in the Roman Tradition: An Examination and Comparison of the Lectionary Readings as Hermeneutical Units in Three Periods. . . . Within the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Bishop Cupich . . . served as a member of the Committee on the Liturgy” (Wikipedia).

  2. Anthony Ruff, OSB Avatar
    Anthony Ruff, OSB

    Crux reports this about Cupich’s time in Rapid City SD:
    “In Rapid City, he clashed with Latin Mass enthusiasts, leading to a standoff on Good Friday, when critics say he barred them from celebrating Holy Week services in Latin.”
    http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2014/09/19/new-chicago-archbishop-appears-to-be-cupich/

    awr

    1. Paul Inwood

      @Anthony Ruff, OSB – comment #2:

      Surely all that means is that he upheld the provisions of Summorum Pontificum art. 2 that the Triduum is not to be celebrated according to the 1962 Missal.

      1. Anthony Ruff, OSB Avatar
        Anthony Ruff, OSB

        @Paul Inwood – comment #3:
        Paul, article 2 of SP concerns Masses without the people, for which a priest may use 1962 or 1972 missal with no further permission needed from bishop. Triduum Masses (and Good Friday solemn liturgy) are not celebrated without the people. I could be mistaken, but I believe that Triduum Masses and Good Friday liturgy with the people may be celebrated in 1962 with bishop’s permission. Bishop Haas in Lichtenstein has celebrated Triduum liturgy in 1962. But it is this that Cupich apparently did not allow.
        awr

      2. @Anthony Ruff, OSB – comment #4:
        Universae Eccleisae clarifies the situation. One may use the Triduum rites of the 1962 Missal, even to the point of repeating the celebrations.

      3. Matthew Morelli

        @Paul Inwood – comment #3:

        I do vaguely recall numerous bishops interpreting that the Triduum was excluded — partly by Art. 2 of SP and partly by the fact that for many communities it would have meant choosing between forms in celebrating the Triduum since it is a single celebration in each Church.

        This was clarified in Universae Ecclesiae 33, making explicit that SP not only allows the Triduum in the EF, but also allows the possibility of repeating the Triduum in the EF. However, that document did not appear until Bishop Cupich was already in Spokane, so the conclusion he drew was reasonable, even if it was not the one in the clarification.

        In short – I don’t think we can read much into this incident based on the Crux article.

  3. Lee Bacchi

    I know the Web is ablaze (pardon the pun) with stories on the announcement in a few hours, I am just waiting to make sure it is true — and praying mightily!!

  4. Rocco insinuated his appointment to Milwaukee in 2010 was blocked. The year before, at a priest conference there, he said this about the English MR3:

    “This is not โ€˜reform of the reformโ€™ โ€“ all that language weโ€™re hearing from people who have an axe to grind or who are trying to cause trouble for the church; this is an ongoing attempt to try and have an actual translation of the Latin into vernacular. This is the first time in the history of the church we have done this; we have to be patient with ourselves.”

  5. Peter Rehwaldt

    In one of his posts about Cupich’s appointment, Rocco points to a talk by Cupich at a Catholic University of America conference on the Catholic response to libertarianism. He was tapped to respond to the keynote address by Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga SDB of Tegucigalpa.

    http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2014/09/for-chicago-thunder-is-in.html
    His response did not reference liturgy specifically, but has some sections that speak very very clearly about the discussions around liturgy within the church:

    as the Cardinal notes, some of the Popeโ€™s critics say that his views on the economy are wanting precisely because he speaks out of the limited experience of living in Argentina with its difficult economic and political history or that he is just uninformed about capitalism and a market economy, especially its claims of reducing global poverty. But, I think those who easily dismiss what the Pope is saying because of his turn to real life experience fail to appreciate that he is calling people to a more authentic way of knowing and learning. He is challenging them about how they are informed. . . . Instead of approaching life from the thirty thousand feet level of ideas, he challenges policy makers and elected officials โ€“ indeed all of us – to experience the life of everyday and real people. His pithy phrase in the Joy of the Gospel says it all: Reality is greater than ideas. Ideas cannot be disconnected from realities; the two must be in dialogue. He is concerned that leaders and policy makers โ€œare stuck in the realm of pure ideasโ€ thus disconnected from realities. Ideas are important as they can classify and define, but realities call us to action.

    The critique of “being stuck in the realm of pure ideas” certainly fits some of what is going on in the Roman Catholic church around liturgy: translation practices and norms, how one is to interpret Vatican II’s liturgical documents, how one is to use other liturgical teaching statements, the use of various vestments, etc.

  6. Matthew Morelli

    @Rita Ferrone

    Further information about the “clash” spoken of in Crux‘s article:

    The dispute occurred in 2002, during the Indult era set forth by the document Ecclesia Dei — long before the right to celebrate the Triduum according to the EF was made implicit in SP and clarified explicitly in UE. To not note the date (especially considering how much has changed in the last 12 years concerning the EF) demonstrates a journalistic lapse on the part of Crux.

    1. Anthony Ruff, OSB Avatar
      Anthony Ruff, OSB

      @Matthew Morelli – comment #11:
      Matthew,
      Thanks much for your helpful clarifications.
      awr

  7. Matt Herek

    Well, here’s something minor, but nice to see. Local news followed the new archbishop down to Omaha where he celebrated mass today.

    Nothing epic…but he was carrying a hymnal in the opening procession and singing….I’m good with that.

  8. Matt Herek

    Speaking of if anyone is curious about his comments in said report…and what looks like a more informal liturgical style…

    http://chicago.cbslocal.com/video/10608826-chicagos-new-archbishop-returns-to-his-home/

  9. Betty O'Brien

    I am from the Spokane Diocese and was so happy & sad to see the appointment of Archbishop Cupich to Chicago. He’s been to our church in Othello, WA a few times and was so kind and holy. I was able to take him and our local priest Fr. Alex Zepeda out to lunch after confirmation in our church in May. (I felt so honored to be able to do that) Archbishop Cupich is a very knowledgeable, kind and friendly. The Chicago diocese is very lucky to have him. I thought he could be pope too but his age is a little against him but that is the only thing. Many blessings to him and to the Chicago diocese.

  10. Kimberley O'Brien Chicago

    I agree with Betty O’Brien — the Chicago diocese is VERY VERY lucky to have Archbishop Cupich. So happy to hear the positive responses from the community!


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading