The “Throwaway Culture” and The Way We Worship

by Frank Kloseย 

One reason Pope Francis has captured the hearts of so many is his approach to moral issues. Instead of hammering doctrine, Pope Francis seeks to transform the hearts of believers, giving them the tools to make sound moral judgments. In this way, he empowers Catholics to take responsibility by helping them take on those virtues and habits that will lead to that which is already doctrine.

Pope Francis famously (or infamously, to some) cautioned that an obsession with issues such as abortion cannot be the only focus of the faith. He also addressed the mentality that leads people to have an abortion:

Pope Francis characterized abortion as a product of a “widespread mentality of profit, the ‘throwaway culture,’ which has today enslaved the hearts and minds of so many.”

So, I must ask: have we succumbed to this “throwaway culture” in our worship?

Back in April 1977, Omer Westendorf wrote in Hymn magazine (accessed via Donald Boccardi’s The History of Hymnals Since Vatican II) that the use of throwaway resources contributed to a throwaway culture that detracts from the faith:

The very concept of throwaway hymns and throwaway scriptures tends to reinforce their feelings of insecurity, of unending changes of a faith in a permanent state of flux.

Boccardi points out that environmental concerts, the waste of natural resources and money were among Westendorf’s further concerns:

If a year’s supply of missaelettes were bound into a hard cover book, each church would be throwing away each year huge quantities of hymn books yearly twice the size of the average Protestant hymnal. In a time of universal ecological crisis, of drastic fuel and energy shortages, the Catholic churches across the nation are disdainfully throwing into the trash heap nearly 7 million copies of these missalettes every month, or 84 million every year.

Thirty three years later we are still in a time of ecological crisis. One particular publisher reportedly distributes 4.3 million “missalettes”ย four times a year. ย The company Westendorf himself founded distributes multiple missals of the “throwaway” variety. Both the company I could find some data for and Westendorf’s company also sell permanent hymnals with a full three-year cycle of lectionary readings and psalms.

I will be the first to admit: I am very likely to use a disposable plate or cup over a reusable one for the convenience of throwing it into a trash can instead of washing it. I agree that it is also much more convenient to have a dated and updated worship aid in my hand over a permanent hymnal. But in doing so, we have succumbed to the “throwaway” culture.

While publishers have indeed taken steps such as using recycled paper to mitigate the environmental blow, we could be doing more. By choosing permanent resources for worship, we can help transform the mindset that Pope Francis is wary of: that everything is temporary and disposable. This is just one small step in negating a “throwaway” culture, but our worship space is a good place to start.

 

Dr. Francis X. Klose is a parish music director and college professor in Philadelphia, PA. Frank recently completed a doctoral degree from Drew University, where his dissertation focused on liturgical music in the United States since the Second Vatican Council.

Other Voices

Please leave a reply.

Comments

23 responses to “The “Throwaway Culture” and The Way We Worship”

  1. Scott Pluff

    This is one of the reasons why my parish switched from Breaking Bread to the hardbound Journeysongs. Plus we will save money in the long run.

    This is also one of the reasons I’ve hesitated to start printing a weekly order of service. It would be helpful to have the day’s psalm refrain, unique hymn texts for the day, and announcements in a printed format. Projection screens would give the flexibility of specific content for each day without the massive use of paper, but those present their own issues for worship.

  2. Jack Wayne

    We have sheets with the readings and propers each week for people who have no missal, but there is an expectation they be given back and they have been re-used for years.

    I’ve always liked how unintentionally green we are since traddies love old stuff. Many people use old second hand missals and the hymnals are all old ones that would have been thrown away.

  3. Some of it is momentum from an age when hymnals were not prepared for contemporary music. It took a whole generation for publishers to pour their post-conciliar compositions into bound books. Hymnals might have lacked a certain cred in those days, too.

    That said, I agree with the use of hardbound hymnals. My parish also struggles with a situation of non-intrusiveness in announcing music and has considered “bulletins.”

    Ironically, the use of music software enables us to produce extremely nice worship aids today. I can make my own compositions and those of our students look even better than a page on our 20-year-old hymnals.

  4. Alan Griffiths

    I look forward to a time when we can celebrate Mass without people needing to have books or any papers in their hands. They will know simple chants for the Ordinary by heart (like older Catholics in the UK knew the Missa De Angelis), they will be able to sing the responsorial psalm because the response is simple enough to be easily picked up, or on occasions they will listen to the schola singing the gradual. The schola will sing, or organ or other instruments will play at the preparation of the altar and a simple chant taken from the Gospel of the Mass will serve at Communion.

    AG

    1. @Alan Griffiths – comment #4:
      I think your picture is not bad, assuming your schola and organist get to the time when they don’t need music either.

  5. Martyn Storey

    In my new parish we’ve started projecting the liturgy onto a screen. There have been a few teething troubles, like when the sun’s too strong. But once you get used to it, it’s more immediate and less restricting than mass sheets, hymnals, etc.

  6. Anne K. Duffy, sfcc

    In our parish we project the words and music on two large screens, visible to all the assembly. Familiar hymns need only words. Acclamations have words and music as also do hymns that are new or used infrequently. The assembly’s attention can remain focused on the action at the altar while they glance as needed at the screen.
    This works fine and we have great celebrations!

  7. The projection screens are indeed a great option, that I probably should have mentioned. The parish I once observed who used them had the best participation of any parish I’d ever been. The one drawback was I did not have a melody line to sing something unfamiliar to me. I think that the initial reaction to the idea of a screen is one of horror. I was guilty of thinking they were bad news, but once I experienced it, I was a huge fan.

  8. W. W. O'Bryan

    The Methodist Church where I played the organ no longer need an organist when they installed a screen and used country and western videos to lead the congregational singing because the pastor through using modern technology and popular music might attract a younger group of folks. It hasn’t. Projection screens may be an option but may present some problems.

  9. Mike Burns

    I am having a hard time making the necessary cognitive connection between abortion and a throw away missalette. Am I alone?

    1. @Mike Burns – comment #9:
      Mike, Pope Francis says it’s the culture’s attitude that we dispose of almost everything that is the mindset that leads to abortion. This is one small way that we have fallen into this cultural trap.

      1. @Frank Klose – comment #10:
        Traditionalists, of course, are tainted by this, too, in wanting to dispose of a council, its deliberations and lawful discernment and actions in the years that followed.

  10. Jack Wayne

    Todd, you really don’t need to bash traditionalists every chance you get, especially when you don’t seem to know enough about them to make such judgements.

    Most, as in a vast majority, don’t want to dispose of a council.

    1. @Jack Wayne – comment #12:
      I thought I was being critical of a particular throwaway tendency, of poking at the inference that traditionalism can claim a higher level of virtue, and reflecting a certain silliness in equating grave moral misbehavior with disposable paper.

      I don’t take advantage of “every” chance; I know where to find Rorate Caeli, for instance, and I don’t even bother reading them.

      I’m not sure what the threshold number of traditionalists is required. Is it enough to read some of their other blogs? To know people personally? For such to account for a set percentage of one’s acquaintances, friends, and/or reading material?

      1. @Todd Flowerday – comment #14:
        Todd, you thought wrong, in so many ways.

  11. Paul Inwood

    I am sure that missalettes served a very useful purpose in the transition from Latin to vernacular, and from the Tridentine Rite to the Missale of Paul VI; and once again in the transition from the Sacramentary to the 201 Roman Missal. But apart from that, what else do they do?

    They lock the people into a printed text instead of raising their heads off the page so that they can be aware of the community around them โ€” in other words, missalettes promote an individualistic approach to liturgy instead of a communal approach. They also perpetuate the phenomenon of a read-along liturgy, at a time when it is no longer necessary (and yes, I know all the arguments about people with hearing difficulties, different learning intelligences, etc, and am not persuaded by them: all those things can be overcome in other ways). Readings are meant to be listened to, not read; similarly with prayers spoken on behalf of the community. I am fond of saying that no one watches the news on TV with the script in their hand, and this is the Good News we’re talking about.

    The whole point of a vernacular liturgy with the priest facing the assembly is so that it can be accessible to people, communicate effectively, and remove barriers to the liturgical action of prayer in common. To continue with a latterday equivalent of hand missals, designed to aid congregations at a time when the Mass was largely silent and in a not-easily-comprehensible language, hidden from view, and an individual act of devotion rather than a communal liturgical action, seems bizarre to me.

    At the same time, it is fascinating to me that people are returning to projection screens as a possible solution to providing people texts for them to have in front of them. I think I have said in this forum previously that when I first started visiting the USA in the mid 1970s projection screens were quite common. By the mid-1980s they had completely disappeared, except in Newman Centers. Partly this was because of the technological limitations at the time, but a much more significant reason was the fact that liturgists had realized that having what is in effect an enormous symbol (or indeed several of them) in the midst of the assembly tends to draw attention away from and overshadow all the other primary liturgical symbols. Have we forgotten this? Do we really want to return to it? Projection screens do have one benefit: that of lifting people’s head out of books and missalettes, but the price to pay may be too much.

    What we need is a serious discussion of what we want people to have in their hands, apart from texts that we want them to say (when they don’t [yet] know them by heart) and texts and music that we’d like them to sing. I have been a proponent in the past of a “purpose-built” worship aid sheet for each celebration, disposed of afterwards, sure, but in these eco-aware days easily recycled. It is more work to produce, but it ensures that the celebration is tailored to the needs and resources of the local community and makes the phenomenon of people having unnecessary texts in their hands easy to control.

  12. Anne K. Duffy, sfcc

    Regarding projection screens, I must add that the architectural stye of the church building does make a difference. We have a modern building and the assembly area is vast and open (no pillars, etc.). The screens, in our situation, do not overshadow or dominate the other symbols present in the altar or assembly area (and our pastor does enjoy decorating the assembly area)! The fan-shaped body of the building enables easy communication with one another. So yes,
    screens don’t work in all church buildings!

  13. Jack Wayne

    Todd, who was inferring traditionalists have achieved a higher level of virtue? Are you implying my post, which did no such thing? Can one say nothing good of traditionalists (and the fondness for reusing old books, vestments, and architectural salvage is indeed a good thing from an environmental standpoint) without it needing to be followed up with a rebuttal?

    Also, blogs should almost never be factored in when judging a group of people.

  14. Comment #2: “Iโ€™ve always liked how unintentionally green we are since traddies love old stuff.” A good small poke, and perhaps I could have let it alone. My apologies for offending.

  15. Jack Wayne

    How was that a poke in any way, shape, or form? You read something into it that wasn’t there.

    Or is anything positive said about traditionalists inherently a poke at the OF?

    1. @Jack Wayne – comment #20:
      Possibly. But you brought “traddies” into the thread. Not me.

      I admit I don’t know “why” you did that. I’m aware of the two main practices in late Tridentine Catholicism: the St Gregory Hymnal and other like productions, and personal missals, often with translations. Sensible practices that ran somewhat off the rails in the 60’s and 70’s–at least a generation ago in many parishes.

      Your post at #2 struck me as an insertion of what seems to be a largely conceded virtue all around: good stewardship with regard to permanent liturgical resources all around. If you say it’s not a poke with virtue, I believe it. I admit I poked in return. I’ll try to be better behaved next time, though I’d like to clarify it’s not individual traditionalists I find bothersome, but rather their flawed philosophies with regard to Catholicism.

  16. Jack Wayne

    Almost any post I make will involve traditionalists, since I attend the EF. I do believe traditionalists practice good stewardship with largely permanent liturgical resouces. Maybe that is a poke, but one grounded in reality.

    I suppose I’m in the same boat as you. I don’t mind anti traditionalists when they talk on most subjects until they also reveal their flawed philosophies and characteristic unwillingness to support their words with evidence (and I will admit to that being a poke). I try not to fall into the trap of thinking only likeminded people are good people.

    1. @Jack Wayne – comment #22:
      Thanks for the reply, Jack. Good point, and taken.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading