Re-Reading Sacrosanctum Concilium: Article 77

Vatican website translation:

77. The marriage rite now found in the Roman Ritual is to be revised and enriched in such a way that the grace of the sacrament is more clearly signified and the duties of the spouses are taught.
“If any regions are wont to use other praiseworthy customs and ceremonies when celebrating the sacrament of matrimony, the sacred Synod earnestly desires that these by all means be retained” [41].
Moreover the competent territorial ecclesiastical authority mentioned in Art. 22, 52, of this Constitution is free to draw up its own rite suited to the usages of place and people, according to the provision of Art. 63. But the rite must always conform to the law that the priest assisting at the marriage must ask for and obtain the consent of the contracting parties.

Latin text:

77. Ritus celebrandi Matrimonium, qui exstat in Rituali romano, recognoscatur et ditior fiat, quo clarius gratia Sacramenti significetur et munera coniugum inculcentur.
“Si quae provinciae… aliis laudabilibus consuetudinibus et caeremoniis” in celebrando Matrimonii Sacramento “utuntur, eas omnino retineri Sancta Synodus vehementer optat”.
Insuper competenti auctoritati ecclesiasticae territoriali, de qua in art. 22 ยง 2 huius Constitutionis, relinquitur facultas, ad normam art. 63, exarandi ritum proprium usibus locorum et populorum congruentem, firma tamen lege ut sacerdos assistens requirat excipiatque contrahentium consensum.

Slavishly literal translation:

77. The Rite of celebrating Matrimony, which exists in the Roman Ritual, is to be reviewed/reformed and made more adorned, by which the grace of the Sacrament may more clearly be signified and the obligations/tasks/offices of the spouses may be communicated.

โ€œIf any provinces useโ€ฆother laudable customs and ceremoniesโ€ in celebrating the Sacrament of Matrimony, โ€œthe Sacred Synod strongly prefers that they by all means be retained.โ€

In addition, the faculty is given to the competent territorial ecclesiastical authority (concerning which [information is found] in article 22 ยง 2 of this Constitution) according to the norm of article 63 to draw up a rite proper to the customs of the places and appropriate to the peoples, nevertheless according to the strict law that the assisting priest request and receive the consent of those contracting [matrimony].

The Council Fathers now turn their attention to the reform of the rites of Matrimony/Marriage. They continue to enunciate the theme appearing throughout their treatment of the reform of sacramental celebration that the texts and ceremonies by which Marriage is celebrated are to โ€œclearly signifyโ€ their meaning, with special attention to the obligations to which the spouses commit themselves. They quote the Council of Trent in allowing various regions to maintain the matrimonial traditions proper to that region. Most interesting they grant to all proper bishopsโ€™ conferences (and not just those in missionary areas) the right to construct a Rite of Matrimony for their region, as long as there is a public exchange of consent between the spouses. After this general introduction, the next article will spell out more concrete guidelines on how the editio typica is to be constructed.

Pray Tell readers may wish to discuss: 1) how well the Rite of Matrimony used in their region clearly employs texts and ceremonies that signify the Catholic Christian understanding of marriage; 2) if they are aware of any significant differences with the Rite of Matrimony used in language groups or cultures other than their own; 3) how the Rite of Matrimony might embody โ€œstagesโ€ by which the dating become engaged and finally married, as well as celebrations of anniversaries of marriage; 4) what elements from oneโ€™s culture might be inculturated into the Roman Rite of Matrimony.

Michael Joncas

Ordained in 1980 as a priest of the Archdiocese of St. Paul-Minneapolis, MN, Fr. (Jan) Michael Joncas holds degrees in English from the (then) College of St. Thomas in St. Paul, MN, and in liturgical studies from the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN and the Pontificio Istituto Liturgico of the Ateneo S. Anselmo in Rome. He has served as a parochial vicar, a campus minister, and a parochial administrator (pastor). He is the author of six books and more than two hundred fifty articles and reviews in journals such as Worship, Ecclesia Orans, and Questions Liturgiques. He has composed and arranged more than 300 pieces of liturgical music. He has recently retired as a faculty member in the Theology and Catholic Studies departments and as Artist in Residence and Research Fellow in Catholic Studies at the University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Please leave a reply.

Comments

6 responses to “Re-Reading Sacrosanctum Concilium: Article 77”

  1. Peter Kwasniewski

    My wife and I were married 15 years ago in the traditional Latin marriage ceremony with the accompany Nuptial Mass. Over the years I have sung in scholas for many such weddings, and every time I am struck by how much richer the theology is than in Ordinary Form weddings. I believe it has to do with the propers, prayers, readings, and the more substantive blessings, not to mention the overall earnestness of atmosphere and the fact that the marriage ceremony takes place before Mass begins, thus enabling the newlyweds to celebrate their first Mass together. In this as in all the other sacraments, the postconciliar reforms of the sacramental rites led to less clarity and density of signification than existed before — particularly in baptism. I am thus overjoyed to see an ever-growing number of couples choosing traditional wedding ceremonies and the Nuptial Mass.

    Speaking of “stages” in the relationship, there is, of course, a Rite of Betrothal that is very beautiful and fitting. We used it ourselves and many among our acquaintance have done so as well. It can be found here:
    http://www.tlmwedding.org/rite-of-betrothal/

  2. Scott Pluff

    In my experience, Catholic weddings haven’t changed much in a generation or more. Very little, if any, congregational singing with the spotlight given to a soloist. A big, grand procession for the bridesmaids and bride “given away” by her father while the priest and groomsmen somehow appear out of the sacristy. Several cute children doing (hopefully) cute things in the procession. Lots of attention to fussy details (obsessively fixing the bride’s train, aisle runner, bubbles outside of church, etc.) Many wide variations and unique add-ons by the presider. De rigueur unity candle/unity sand, flowers to moms and to Mary, fancy programs that list every last person down to the guest book attendant but no order of service. Very little attention to anything of the liturgy and ritual itself.

    And those are the tame ones–not to mention the occasional off-the-wall requests. I generally don’t try to argue these points with couples, many of whom haven’t been to church since grade school. At least they’re getting married in a church and not at a winery or on a cruise ship like most of their formerly-Catholic friends.

    I do occasionally play prayerful and beautiful weddings for couples who are engaged in their faith and life of the church. Those can be glorious. But more often than not, the above description is accurate.

  3. Linda Reid

    My experience has been much the same as Scott’s!

    But lately, ( in the last ten years) there are more and more bright spots! Both my pastor and I try to put forth the ritual elements as they appear in the Rite of Matrimony (I.e. The entrance rite, use of a gathering song etc.) but the secular “traditions” are hard to combat.
    Also, we are seeing fewer and fewer requests for secular music. Most couple are very happy to meet and be guided through music selection appropriate to liturgy.
    Perhaps this is because there are fewer weddings than there used to be. The couples that choose to get married in church now seem to be there intentionally, not because it is the only alternative.
    I am very curious to see a reformation of this rite!

  4. Todd.Orbitz

    Nice. I really enjoy when liturgists try to force the “entrance rite” don the throats of the bride and groom. Yep, having the bride escorted by her father, and being “given” away is a Protestant custom that infiltrated the liturgy.

    However, it is exactly one of those โ€œother laudable customs and ceremoniesโ€ in celebrating the Sacrament of Matrimony, [that] โ€œthe Sacred Synod strongly prefers that they by all means be retained.โ€

    And yet, these same liturgists are the first ones to throw a fit if one would want to omit a cantor and go with a sung gradual.

    In my nightmare of a wedding, I literally had to go all the way to the CDW to have the Archdiocese of Washington instructed to allow the proper chants to be included in the nuptial Mass. And, it wasn’t like ourr nuptials were in the old rite. We had been forbidden that. It was the year 2000, and those of us who wanted to get married in the old rite were simply dismissed as crazy at that time.

    But here’s the best part, I was initially given a list of music which could not be used at the Nuptial Mass, along with a white list that the parish had. Iron ic, they literally were using the instructions of 1958’s De Musica Sacra to forbid Gounod’s Ave Maria, while Gather Us In and Be Not Afraid were on the white list.

  5. I think an important issue to address in this paragraph is, “What cultural rituals should be included in the rite?” I am not encouraging priests to play Jennifer Lopez (The Wedding Planner) and create some unique, ad-libbed celebration of individuality, but the council fathers seem to be encouraging local adaptation in this area. They wanted us to look to our culture and see what can be included and retained? It seems the unity candle is a good candidate for this. What is wrong with it? Again, I am against any experimentation by the priest himself, but the bishops should be considering what cultural elements can be included in the rite.

  6. Ren Aguila

    I think it’s worth noting that while some elements of Western Protestant marriage ceremonies are being borrowed around these parts, the ritual cord and veil ceremony (which I understand came from the Toledo Manual) was one of the first distinct cultural elements the Philippine bishops introduced into the contemporary marriage rite.

    That said, one problem that I have heard of is that, given the massive importance of church weddings and the equally massive importance given to particular places, some churches literally have weddings by the hour. Being wed in one’s parish church, unless it is a decent location, is considered a “second option.”


by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading