How to give a homily

by Claire Mathieu

Most Catholics only hear the Word of God broken open during homilies. How can homilies have more impact? The faithful could easily prepare better to receive it, but most do not; and the Holy Spirit, in my opinion, could easily do a better job (!), but somehow chooses not to: given that reality, what can homilists do to preach more effectively? How can their message be better heard, understood, remembered, and acted upon? Expectations are high, yet parishioners rarely give feedback about homilies, and what little they do give is seldom specific and almost never constructive.

A few years ago, lay people in France formed an organization called “SOH” (as in “Service for Optimizing Homilies”), to help priests, deacons, seminarians, and lay leaders of funeral services, improve their style so as to be more effective. I joined it last year. It has the support of the CEF (the French equivalent of the USCCB) via the SNLPS (National Service for Liturgy and Sacramental Practice), as well as the approval of the bishop in each of the 8 dioceses where it is active, in France and in Belgium.

Priests and deacons who wish to become better homilists sign up for a free series of four half-day training sessions, during which we study some concrete, specific points. Those are separate from actual content, which is the sole realm of the preacher.

  • How does one prevent people’s attention from drifting right away? The first sentence is key, and we study the art of finding a catchy opening;
  • How can the assembly better follow the preacher’sย  line of reasoning? We study techniques to select and present arguments to make a convincing case;
  • Does the homilist merely present an intellectual argument, or is it more of a matter of “deep calling to deep”? We practice how clues in one’s appearance, attitude, and voice, can help a heart-to-heart communication;
  • After the Mass, do the people merely say: “It was a good homily!” without being able to remember what it was about, or can they reconstruct the key points? We go over a few techniques that help memorization;
  • Is the homily merely something thoughtful and touching to admire, or does it spur some action on the part of the listeners?ย  We study the translation of the main message of the homily into some simple, concrete suggestion for the parishioners.

The work is focused on practice. In every session, the three participants each give a homily, followed by a collective analysis, then they watch a videotape of their own homily. Itย  can be a shocking revelation of one’s weak points, resulting in almost instantaneous, spectacular improvements.

Since its beginning in 2007, the association has branched out. Its activities now include visits of seminaries (with 52 seminarians trained so far, from four seminaries), on-site visits of former participants to hear them in context and provide them with a refresher, and individual coaching of people who are too busy to come to the regular sessions. The proportions of participants is correlated with the strength of the local bishop’s support, and varies from one sixth to one quarter of the priests and from one third to one half of the deacons.

What motivates the priests and deacons who sign up for training? They may have a feeling that they are not as effective as they’d like to be, butย  are not able to pin down the precise issues or to know what to do about them, and so they swallow their pride and ask for help. It is a difficult step that takes a lot of humility. Actually, the men who sign up for training sessions care about their homilies and spend muchย  time preparing them, so they tend to be already much better than average, and it is gratifying to see how sometimes breaking a single bad habit can transform their delivery. Evaluations reveal that 90% of participants say that they benefitted from the sessions.

There are also bonuses for us, the lay members. First, we are all interested in homilies, and it’s a pleasure to hear some from various sources. Second, I also learn from the other members of the association (for example one of them is a teacher of theater), andย  in my own profession I can try to use the methods I hear about. Third, we have a free lunch at the chancery after theย  morning’s work, complete with a white tablecloth, cloth napkins, and a close-up view of Notre Dame de Paris cathedral from the hallway window (and similar rewards in other dioceses, I am told.) Fourth, since we are neither parishioners nor in a situation ofย  competition or of hierarchical relations, the priests often open up about the joys and the challenges of their work in general, and I must say that it’s been an eye-opener.ย  Being a parish priest is not easy…

Thus, we hope to be of service to the church by helping preachers learn a little about the art of oratory in practice. It’s fun, and rewarding, and the thanks we get from some of the participants make it all worthwhile!

Website (in French:) http://www.sohcatho.org

Other Voices

Please leave a reply.

Comments

12 responses to “How to give a homily”

  1. Charles Day

    My view from the pew says that 1) some people just have a gift for good homilies, but 2) preparation is the key for those not so naturally gifted. One example is a priest I knew in a small rural parish that my family was good friends with who was also sometimes involved in Toastmasters International. While this man was active in Toastmasters his homilies were great, maybe even better than great. But when he left Toastmasters, the homilies started falling off. So, because we were friends, we’d mention it to him and he would get back in TI, and things would pick up.

    So, I think the basic idea is great and that with enough preparation, most people can give darn good homilies. But the other truth is that most parish priests are over worked already and really don’t have four half days to spare. My current priest, for example, is in a parish that easily needs two priests, but he has been running it by himself (with some help from deacons) for the past two years, and he has built a new school and is working on a new church in that time. Next week, we get a new priest to help him, but it’s been tough on him. I would have a hard time suggesting that my current priest should join such a group.

  2. Claire Mathieu

    Charles: yes, they’re very busy, but it’s a matter of priorities: if the program is effective, then it all depends on how important it is to communicate well in preaching. How much of a priority is it?

    Maybe homilies can be like the five loaves and two fishes: they take time, a precious resource that the homilist does not have enough of by far, but then, they cause people to miraculously come forward to do some of his many other tasks, so that in the end everyone is satisfied and there is even leftover spare time.

  3. Lee Bacchi

    Anything like this here in the U.S., does anyone know?

    1. Rita Ferrone

      @Lee Bacchi – comment #3:
      You know, I don’t think there is. (I’d be glad to be proven wrong!)

      One of the things that struck me about this initiative in a very positive way is that the whole thing is predicated on preachers listening to lay people. Good for them! That seems to be written off here as impossible, however. The only people priests will listen to seriously is other priests, I am told.

      There are exceptions to this rule, I am sure, but they are so few as to be negligible. So nobody here plans anything that would expect priests to take lay people’s feedback seriously. Which seems short-sighted to me.

      I love this initiative, and would like to see it tried in the US.

  4. Jack Rakosky

    Fourth, since we are neither parishioners nor in a situation of competition or of hierarchical relations, the priests often open up about the joys and the challenges of their work in general, and I must say that itโ€™s been an eye-opener.

    I found something similar in 2003 after the sex abuse scandals. The local VOTF group had some small, unadvertised, off-the-record, meetings of priests and laity outside the parish structure. Again neither hierarchical relationships nor competition with each other. Priests really opened up and came across as very savvy and competent without talking down to the other people who were mostly very well educated, age55 plus people.

    That was a far cry from most of my experience in parishes where priests, and many staff, seem full of stock answers. No wonder the Vibrant Parish Life respondents listed โ€œParish staff that listensโ€ as being very important but near the bottom of the list in being well done.

    In her recent book Counter Clockwise: Mindful Health and the Power of Possibility Ellen J. Langer has this to say about the โ€œThe Psychology of Possibilityโ€

    My interest is in what can be, and in learning what subtle changes might make that happen.

    Using a different word, offering a small choice, or making a subtle change in the physical environment can improve our health and well- being.

    Small changes can make large differences, so we should open ourselves to the impossible and embrace a psychology of possibility.

    Langerโ€™s research with the elderly has demonstrated those possibilities.
    My experience in developing leadership ability among persons with severe mental illness also depended on careful attention to small details about the process.

    I suspect making priest-laity encounters productive requires thinking carefully about all the subtle changes that are necessary to get both priests and laity outside their customary roles and relationships as well as creating an environment that does not encourage competition among either priests or laity.

  5. Jim Pauwels

    Claire, this is wonderful!

    Even though I am not a layperson, I am VERY interested in learning how something like this can be spun up in my area. How would one go about sowing SOH in my diocese?

  6. Paulo Reilly

    This sounds lie an excellent initiative. I wonder if something if the sort could be made available in the uk.

  7. Claire Mathieu

    Paulo, I think that for the UK it can be done in a way similar to the way in which SOH expands to a new diocese in France or Belgium: locally, you need to come up with a group of volunteer lay people (who have appropriate professions), and you need a bishop who is interested in sponsoring the initiative, i.e. who will encourage the priests and deacons of his diocese to sign up for it (or seminary director who will require the seminarians to sign up for a series). Then, a delegation of three or four people will come from France and Belgium and run the first series of sessions while training the local volunteers at the same time. (Those volunteers will have read the documents and will be “silent observers” for the first series.) That’s how the transfer of competence happens. The only difference here would be that the people on the delegation need to be anglophone.

    Jim: I am not sure. Traveling to the US is beyond the abilities of the association, so one would need to think of a different process for the transfer of competence. If you wish, send me an email and we can discuss it.

  8. To comment 3.
    I remember Bishop Ken Untener in the Saginaw diocese had a similar program years ago. I am planning to implement something similar in the El Paso diocese.

    1. Rita Ferrone Avatar
      Rita Ferrone

      @Robert Dueweke, OSA – comment #9:
      Wasn’t his preaching program mostly him, visiting all the priests and working with them on their preaching? He was an excellent homilist and homiletics professor. I may be forgetting if there was a component of getting group feedback. Possibly there was that too.

      1. Fr Kurt Barragan

        @Rita Ferrone – comment #10:
        According to his book “Preaching Better”, Untener would select a small group of homilists (five or six) and send them a letter instructing them to tape-record their weekend homily and send it to him. The recordings (along with transcripts) were circulated among the group who would later gather for a two-hour feedback session. Interestingly, compliance was compulsory!

  9. Fr. Jan Michael Joncas

    If anyone would know if there are similar programs to those described by Claire Mathieu for the United States, I think the Rev. Michael E. Connors, C.S.C., Director of the Marten Program in Homiletics and Liturgy at the University of Notre Dame, would. I’ll contact him to see if he can suggest any resources to Pray Tell’s readers.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading