{"id":43852,"date":"2018-11-12T10:19:21","date_gmt":"2018-11-12T16:19:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/?p=43852"},"modified":"2018-11-16T18:38:34","modified_gmt":"2018-11-17T00:38:34","slug":"the-myth-of-noble-simplicity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/","title":{"rendered":"The Myth of Noble Simplicity"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"
Christian Egyptian\/Coptic textile remnant. Ca. 4th-5th cent. Byzantine Museum, Athens.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Years ago as an undergraduate theology student at Loyola University Chicago I had the eye-opening opportunity to take the course <\/span>Introduction to the Orthodox Church<\/span><\/i>, of which I had no experience, and very little knowledge. For my final project I wrote a very basic comparison between the visuality (before it was even a thing) of the reformed Roman Catholic Mass and the Orthodox Divine Liturgy – pictures included. On the Roman side of the ring, <\/span>Environment and Art in Catholic Worship<\/span><\/i>, with its mix of ideas from The Federation of Diocesan Liturgical Commissions and Bob Hovda, and the images of Frank Kacmarcik\u2019s churches. On the Orthodox side, a few patristic commentaries on the liturgy, and the most wild images of crown toting bishops and crossed candles I could muster in the nascent internet era. In truth, I intimated that the Orthodox liturgy was in dire need of reform, given the sound logic of <\/span>Sacrosanctum Concillium<\/span><\/i> and the document <\/span>EACW<\/span><\/i>. My Orthodox priest\/professor thought the comparison was interesting, but challenged me to think further about <\/span>tradition<\/span><\/i>, the judgement-making mechanisms of what is <\/span>appropriate<\/span><\/i>, the role of <\/span>culture<\/span><\/i>, and yes, the meaning of <\/span>nobility<\/span><\/i>, and <\/span>simplicity<\/span><\/i>. My undergraduate brain had little sense of what he was on about. I do now.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Absis de Sant Climent de Ta\u00fcll. Ca. 1123.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

There is nothing more disheartening as a liturgical practitioner of art and architecture than to see well-developed, artistically and liturgically sound, and beautiful projects, handicapped or even completely obliterated, by well-meaning, but ultimately un-formed and uninformed, committees, commissions, pastors, and bishops, in the name of noble simplicity. It’s happened to me and to colleagues countless times, and it spans our denominations. Careful listening often reveals that those with decision-making power many times have little understanding of what is intended by \u2018noble simplicity\u2019 and what its boundaries are. Yet, to me, there is a more fundamental issue at stake: Noble simplicity as a liturgical-theological aesthetic (the way things <\/span>look<\/span><\/i>) is a myth, both as an historical assertion, and as a category of contemporary compulsory praxis.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Artist’s recreation of the interior of Santa Costanza (4th cent), Rome, using the apse mosaic of Sant’ Apollinare in Classe (6th cent).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The term, as many others have discussed in more ample ways, is found in <\/span>Sacrosanctum Concillium <\/span><\/i>34. Here it deals with the structure and language of rites. Chapter 7, dealing specifically with art and architecture,<\/span>\u00a0states in distinction that the aesthetic tenor of sacred art is noble <\/span>beauty<\/span><\/i>. This is opposed to mere sumptuous display – and here one wonders if ‘mere’ is the problem. The notion that simplicity should be the visual character of the liturgical environment is nowhere to be found – beauty is. In fact, the introduction to Chapter 7 states that the Church has never had a particular style, which from the perspective of art, is where simplicity would be embodied. One can\u2019t logically have it both ways, then – all styles, but only the simple ones. I have always found it a bit ironic, therefore, that subsequent scholars and reform-leaders \u00a0promoted art and architectural simplicity as the conciliar leitmotif of contemporary church building somehow as a seemingly necessary corollary to the Roman Rite\u2019s \u2018genius\u2019. But was the Roman Rite so noble and simple as Ludovico Muratori (1672-1750) and Edmund Bishop (1846-1917) conceived of it?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
San Clemente, Rome. Detail. Translation of Saint Clement. C. 1080.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Stational liturgies and multiple processional crosses – to name just a few eccentricities – would seem to suggest otherwise. Perhaps the prayer structures and their Latin were, but perhaps only in contrast to their liturgical counterparts. Yet, in terms of visual culture there is no evidence that the Roman Rite was ever ocularly spartan. From the perspective of Christian material culture, liturgy, even in its earliest embodiments in the pre-Constantinian period, was seemingly colorful, painted, patterned, materialed, architectural, and soundfull. \u00a0And only became more so.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Coronation Mass. Saint Pope Paul VI. 29 June 1963.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Although notes from Subcommission XIII involved in composing <\/span>SC<\/span><\/i> do not exist on this point, the conciliar concern over sumptuous display seemed not to have been directly related to some imagined purified ur-rite, but the Baroque context of Italy, the hyper-devotional displays of popular religion, and the pageantry of the papal court. \u00a0\u00a0In the original scheme of <\/span>SC<\/span><\/i> there was to be a further chapter on the use of liturgical vestments and utensils which was soon folded into a highly abridged Chapter 7. It is perhaps telling that both in the formulation of <\/span>SC<\/span><\/i> and its surrounding debate, much of the ‘simplification’ camp were formed of a close-knit group of eurocentric scholars. The global outsiders tended to be far more concerned with inculturation and the liturgical insinuation that they needed to look European in their worship. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Auguste Perret and Gustave Perret. \u00c9glise Notre-Dame du Raincy. 1922-23.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Nonetheless, in the grand scheme noble simplicity and noble beauty came to be conflated even if they were two separate realities in <\/span>SC<\/span><\/i>. This was especially the case in the subsequent <\/span>General Instruction of the Roman Missal<\/span><\/i>. \u00a0In this document, there is a clear merger of beauty and simplicity. And in what must be one of the grossest over-reaches in art and architectural theory ever recorded, it insists that simplicity is the \u201cbest\u201d companion of \u201cgenuine art\u201d (n.325) ! How such an absolute statement was deduced is left in silence. The dynamic was of course reflected in <\/span>EACW <\/span><\/i>with its fetishization of simplicity before which one was to \u201cstand back and truly see\u201d. But in fact, in art and architectural history the die was cast for such a merger at the turn of the twentieth century. The banlieues of Paris were especially notable in this respect for the<\/span> \u0152uvre des Chantiers du Cardinal<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>a project began in the early 1900\u2019s meant to provide new churches for the burgeoning population. Much of the inspiration came from Auguste Parrets\u2019 church Notre Dame du Raincy, the first church ever constructed in structural concrete. Such spaces necessitated architectural simplicity according to the dictates of their materials. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Hans van der Laan. St Benedictusberg Abbey, Vaals. 1967. Chapel.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Its very hard to glam cement. An added element came to define the work. An anthropology developed suggesting proper buildings reflected the nature of their users. The building must be simple, uncomplicated, as the Parisian factory workers supposedly were. Whether Pie-Raymond Regamey and Marie-Alain Courtuier were directly influenced by the <\/span>Chantiers<\/span><\/i> work is not clear, but certainly the liturgical thought of Regamey was based in an anthropology of poverty, as is evidenced in his many writings upon the essential nature of poverty to the experience of Christianity.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Antoni Gaud\u00ed. Bas\u00edlica i Temple Expiatori de la Sagrada Fam\u00edlia. 1882-Present.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Too vast to trace out here, the defining anthropology of poverty and simplicity echoes throughout the liturgical renewal and is reflected in the thought of Pope John XXIII and the Second Vatican Council. The pastoral concern for doctrinal and religious simplicity, based in an anthropological conception of the \u2018worker\u2019, undoubtedly influenced liturgical reform writ large. Noble simplicity was not simply about the supposed <\/span>usus antiquior <\/span><\/i>of the Roman Rite, but a hermeneutic of pastoral adaptation, mission, and relevance. The Church\u2019s agenda of liturgical clarity and the architectural\/artistic world\u2019s \u00a0interest in purity were easily conflated, and in fact were so, both before and after the Council. This reliance upon an anthropology of poverty and relevance to the \u2018worker\/everyman\u2019 was strongly expressed in the work of the Dutch liturgical architect Hans van der Laan (1904-1991) OSB, and the American Edward S\u00f6vik (1918-2014) that sought to \u2018humanize\u2019 liturgical space in scale and material. <\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Burgundian gothic chasuble. Order of the Golden Fleece. Ca. 1453.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

My point here is not to call into question the value of liturgical clarity in ritual enactment as envisioned by the liturgical renewal. \u00a0What I do find problematic is the manner the concept of noble simplicity was and is employed as an aesthetic category involving both architecture and art. Certainly in the case of visual history, Christian art and architecture has not been constrained by, nor defined by simplicity. \u00a0More problematically, in as much as noble simplicity has come to define the liturgical environment based upon an anthropology of poverty, it must be recognized that such an argument was descriptive and not prescriptive, as cultures most certainly change. As a pastoral approach to modernity it has no inherent theological value. \u00a0Indeed, I would suggest the notion that western society is \u2018uneducated\u2019 and \u2018simple\u2019 is certainly past its prime. In many respects, the anthropology the Council was belatedly working out of was an approach geared to the vestiges of industrial society. Today, a \u2018simple\u2019 Church seems rather fanciful in the matrix of social and technological advancements.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Beryl Dean. Jubilee Cope. 1977. Diocese of London.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In his commentary upon the <\/span>Rite of a Dedication of a Church and Altar<\/span><\/i>, Ignazio Calabuig, OSM, articulated what I believe is the most clear ritual and aesthetic guideline of contemporary liturgy – that of <\/span>supersigns <\/span><\/i>– which to my mind is far better geared toward the present. Yet, this does not indicate what the plastic appearance of those signs must be. It does not really indicate what the liturgy must <\/span>look<\/span><\/i> like. In short, liturgical clarity does not necessarily mean artistic simplicity.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Indeed, why something should be simple at all is fraught with all sorts of cultural baggage. I have been involved in not a few cases in which ecclesial powers have dictated what a project should look like based upon the assertion that the community was too simple to really understand art, or their architectural vision was too this or that, or what the community desired was too sophisticated, too avant-garde, or too traditional. \u00a0Essentially, a type of intellectual neo-colonialism: Let us tell you what you are capable of desiring and understanding. In all the cases, no matter what the <\/span>look<\/span><\/i> was, the demigod noble simplicity was invoked as the supporting justification. \u00a0This tells me that indeed, noble simplicity is a myth that continues to wreak havoc on the liturgical environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Lello Scorzelli, La Porta della Preghiera (1968-71, Basilica di San Pietro, Citt\u00e0 del Vaticano). Detail of the Death of Simeon. Commissioned by St. Pope Paul VI.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In saying all this, my intention isn’t to determine what liturgical art and architecture need to look like therefore, if indeed there is a \u2018need\u2019 at all. It is my intention, rather, to insist that neither nobility nor simplicity singularly represent an immutable theological aesthetic or truism, as well as to emphasize that these adjectives are not somehow self-interpreting, and therefore even useful. There is <\/span>per se<\/span><\/i>, no singular theological paradigm of our visual worlds, least of all for our churches – certainly not historically. \u00a0Liturgical clarity is not a style. So I return to the challenge of my Orthodox professor. What is appropriate is found somewhere in the intersection of tradition, culture, and human creativity. I\u2019m reminded of the sage words of Aidan Kavanagh penned some years ago; “noble simplicity”, he wrote, must be approached with a \u201ccertain healthy impiety\u201d. Thirty-six years on, I would go further. It\u2019s time to put the myth to rest. So let a hundred artistic flowers bloom. Even the more extravagant ones.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
San Clemente, Rome. Detail. Apse mosaic. Ca. 1130.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Liturgical clarity does not mean artistic simplicity.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":76,"featured_media":43932,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3117,8,357,619,32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-scholarship-new-ws","category-art-and-architecture","category-demographics-and-sociology","category-liturgical-movement","category-vatican-ii"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Myth of Noble Simplicity - Home<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Myth of Noble Simplicity - Home\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Liturgical clarity does not mean artistic simplicity.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Home\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-12T16:19:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-17T00:38:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Hadley.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"518\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"420\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"James Hadley, OblSB\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"James Hadley, OblSB\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"James Hadley, OblSB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f7aac9e594a4079f3739f741873c0e51\"},\"headline\":\"The Myth of Noble Simplicity\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-12T16:19:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-17T00:38:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1975,\"commentCount\":22,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/Hadley.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"3_SCHOLARSHIP\",\"Art and Architecture\",\"Demographics and Sociology\",\"Liturgical Movement\",\"Vatican II\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Myth of Noble Simplicity - Home\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/Hadley.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-12T16:19:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-17T00:38:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/Hadley.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/Hadley.jpg\",\"width\":518,\"height\":420},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/2018\\\/11\\\/12\\\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Myth of Noble Simplicity\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Home\",\"description\":\"Worship, Wit & Wisdom\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Home\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/cropped-BlogHeaderFinal2.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/cropped-BlogHeaderFinal2.jpg\",\"width\":1340,\"height\":209,\"caption\":\"Home\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f7aac9e594a4079f3739f741873c0e51\",\"name\":\"James Hadley, OblSB\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Screenshot-2024-01-05-17.31.14-e1704472371888-96x96.png?crop=1\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Screenshot-2024-01-05-17.31.14-e1704472371888-96x96.png?crop=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Screenshot-2024-01-05-17.31.14-e1704472371888-96x96.png?crop=1\",\"caption\":\"James Hadley, OblSB\"},\"description\":\"James Hadley is a priest in the Church of England. He previously taught Liturgical Art and Architecture, as well as church design, at the Catholic University of America, Rome Campus. He lectured in Faith and Culture for the Rome summer program of the Australian Catholic University. He has published in Anaphora, Studia Liturgica, Ecclesia Orans, Material Culture Review, as well as the Irish Theological Quarterly. In addition to his parish ministry he works as a liturgical artist and designer. James has a special interest in immigration issues in Europe, traveling regularly to the island of Lampedusa with clergy and students to raise awareness of human trafficking.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/praytellblog.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/jthadley\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Myth of Noble Simplicity - Home","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Myth of Noble Simplicity - Home","og_description":"Liturgical clarity does not mean artistic simplicity.\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/","og_site_name":"Home","article_published_time":"2018-11-12T16:19:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-17T00:38:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":518,"height":420,"url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Hadley.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"James Hadley, OblSB","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"James Hadley, OblSB","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/"},"author":{"name":"James Hadley, OblSB","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f7aac9e594a4079f3739f741873c0e51"},"headline":"The Myth of Noble Simplicity","datePublished":"2018-11-12T16:19:21+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-17T00:38:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/"},"wordCount":1975,"commentCount":22,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Hadley.jpg","articleSection":["3_SCHOLARSHIP","Art and Architecture","Demographics and Sociology","Liturgical Movement","Vatican II"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/","url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/","name":"The Myth of Noble Simplicity - Home","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Hadley.jpg","datePublished":"2018-11-12T16:19:21+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-17T00:38:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Hadley.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Hadley.jpg","width":518,"height":420},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/2018\/11\/12\/the-myth-of-noble-simplicity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Myth of Noble Simplicity"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/","name":"Home","description":"Worship, Wit & Wisdom","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#organization","name":"Home","url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-BlogHeaderFinal2.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/cropped-BlogHeaderFinal2.jpg","width":1340,"height":209,"caption":"Home"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/#\/schema\/person\/f7aac9e594a4079f3739f741873c0e51","name":"James Hadley, OblSB","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2024-01-05-17.31.14-e1704472371888-96x96.png?crop=1","url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2024-01-05-17.31.14-e1704472371888-96x96.png?crop=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Screenshot-2024-01-05-17.31.14-e1704472371888-96x96.png?crop=1","caption":"James Hadley, OblSB"},"description":"James Hadley is a priest in the Church of England. He previously taught Liturgical Art and Architecture, as well as church design, at the Catholic University of America, Rome Campus. He lectured in Faith and Culture for the Rome summer program of the Australian Catholic University. He has published in Anaphora, Studia Liturgica, Ecclesia Orans, Material Culture Review, as well as the Irish Theological Quarterly. In addition to his parish ministry he works as a liturgical artist and designer. James has a special interest in immigration issues in Europe, traveling regularly to the island of Lampedusa with clergy and students to raise awareness of human trafficking.","url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/author\/jthadley\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Hadley.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/76"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43852"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43852\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43933,"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43852\/revisions\/43933"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/43932"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/praytellblog.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}