Viewpoint: Is Human Society a Covenant Community or a Marketplace?

by Msgr. M. Francis Mannion

The United States was founded as a covenant society–a society held together by a covenant with God and between citizens. This notion was uppermost in the minds of the Founding Fathers. Social institutions were to be inspired and directed by the concept of covenant.

Recent social commentators have lamented the breakdown of this conception of society and the general social malaise it has wrought.

One of the most problematic trends that kills the notion of covenant is the industrialization and commercialization of social institutions. By this I mean that everything is viewed in commercial terms and evaluated by its worth in the market place.

If we pay attention to the growing use of the word โ€œindustry,โ€ we will see how all-pervasive this trend is. We speak today of the health care industry, the funeral industry, the arts industry, the farming industry, the music industry, the entertainment industry. The list is endless.

The problematic results of commercialization and industrialization have become evident in the reorganization of the legal and medical professions according to industrial models.

Parishes today increasingly employ โ€œbusiness managersโ€–a troublesome capitulation to industrial culture. The church is not a business; the word โ€œtreasurerโ€ would be better. A national liturgical music organization sponsored a panel some years ago on the โ€œliturgical music industry.โ€ (Iโ€™m not making this up!)

In the parish in which I serve, there are twenty-seven nursing and retirement homes. All of them are run for profit. The well run are expensive and available only to a minority. In the rest, every attempt is made to cut corners. The results are scandalous conditions of overcrowding and general neglect.

What all this underlines is a growing view of human society as a market place, where everything becomes a commodity to be bought or sold, and every service and talent turned into a profit-making venture.

To question this trend is not to suggest that we should try to return to the simpler world where the country doctor and the storekeeper were not overly concerned about money, and where the economic exchange system was more familial and neighborly.

It is to suggest that the demise of the covenant community concept of society is the demise of civilized living. Life becomes a rat race, and business is conducted without mercy.

In a covenant society, workers and professionals see their careers primarily in vocational terms. Society is viewed as an extended family. Goods and commodities are traded and sold, and realistic business does go on, but always in a manner that makes economics answerable to the concerns of social justice and charity.

One of the main challenges for the contemporary church, not least in regard to its hospitals and health care systems, is that of witnessing effectively to the possibility of living together as a covenanted people, a community of care, trust, and solidarity.

Safeguarding the covenant community view of human coexistence is one of the fundamental issues that has constantly engaged the American bishops. Pope Francisโ€™ magnificent stances against the greedy commercial society have given this concern an enormous boost. For him, as for Pope John Paul II, the dignity of the human person, realized in community with others, is the criterion against which all economic life must be measured.

The commercialization and industrialization of society represents a very beguiling trend. It has much that is attractive about it, but it is finally idolatrous. Its ultimate achievement can only be to reduce the quality of life that it so deceivingly espouses.

Msgr. Mannion is pastor emeritus of St. Vincent de Paul Catholic Church in Salt Lake City. Reprinted by permission of Catholic News Agency.

Francis Mannion

Please leave a reply.

Comments

6 responses to “Viewpoint: Is Human Society a Covenant Community or a Marketplace?”

  1. Most of the Founders were merchants who were forced to smuggle goods or face every increasing taxes from the mother country. The sudden upturn in enforcement of taxes and trade restrictions, along with an increase in the difficulty of bribing royal officials, was the catalyst for the revolution.

    The founders were certainly bright men, with plenty of good — if incomplete — ideas about equality and freedom. But they were strongly motivated by commercial and industrial interests.

  2. Victor Wowczuk

    That the founding fathers had as uppermost basis for the nation the idea of a covenant between society and God is problematic and may be a romanticised view of the origin of the country. Most of them were deists who did not want any particular religion to interfere in the state, unlike in Britain. This idea of covenant was more important for a kingdom than for a republic. Today, it is Islam that seems to have maintained the highest regard for covenant between God and society.

    Closer to home, I do not think there is a growing view of society as a market place. It is now the only dominant view. Profit is everything. It is what makes the wheels of society work best. That is what the people want. This may be based on avarice, but it is a fact. Of course, there is a lot more to this universe than mammon, and a lot of people are being cast by the wayside because of the social Darwinism that the market place fosters. The only morals are those that support a free market economy.

    This does go against the magisterium of Catholicism, but how much Catholicism is followed by Catholics today? Who are even familiar with it, especially since it does not support the popular ideas of freedom and equality? On the one side you have those Catholics who would make Ayn Rand regular bed time reading; on the other side you have those who think the Church forgot to add the State to the Trinity. It seems that pagan ideology determines a lot of what Catholics believe. Nevertheless, the Msgr has rightly pointed out that it is the dignity of the human person that is essential here. But with the perverted ideas that dominate our society, that is hard to preach.

  3. Jim Pauwels

    What a wonderful essay.

    Every public institution, from a family to a parish to a business to a school to a nursing home, has an economic dimension. That is just unavoidable. What surely deserves our attention, though, is whether the economic dimension is usurping the priorities that other dimensions of these institutions should claim. Marriages and families break up over money; businesses lay off employees because of money; nursing homes cut corners because of money. All of these cases could be sinful, because they seem to privilege money over what should be more important. Money should serve the family bond, the employer-employee covenant, the care for our elderly – not the other way around.

  4. Jim Pauwels

    Regarding parish business manager vs. treasurer: I assume the idea is that not-for-profit organizations have treasurers, and not-for-profits, as the term implies, are primarily motivated by something other than pure financial gain? There is something to be said for that. On the other hand, for-profit businesses have treasurers, too. And a parish business manager does more than financial management, in my observation: s/he often runs the operations of the parish, too (e.g. overseeing the physical plant).

    My grandparents would probably grumble, “They didn’t need parish managers back in my day.” Their expectation would have been that the pastor was the parish manager, and one measure of the pastor’s effectiveness would have been his effectiveness as a parish manager. Surely parish managers have come about because pastors can’t simultaneously manage a parish’s financial/operational needs and its pastoral needs, particularly with fewer associate pastors these days.

  5. Tom Blackburn

    First, an Amen to Jim Pauwels. I’d rather have a pastor who reads the breviary than one who doesn’t have time because he is negotiating with providers who haven’t provided (as providers so often don’t). Anyone with brains can do the latter job, but the pastor can’t preach effectively if he doesn’t pray. Which has been widely proved.

    Second, an Amen to Msgr. Mannion, who has put his finger on what’s wrong with everything. The Founders were probably more interested in the covenant among men, a la Rousseau, than covenants with God (the Pilgrims, of course, excepted, but they weren’t Founders). But the Founders and Framers were covenanters almost to a man.

  6. Rita Ferrone Avatar
    Rita Ferrone

    I agree very much with Msgr. Mannion’s post. When we neglect the importance of covenant as the basis of society other things rush in to fill the vacuum.

    I’m late to this thread, and may need to start a new one to discuss this, but it has been on my mind that this relates to Lent. The Lent Year B lectionary is organized around the theme of covenant and renewal of covenant, yet we never hear any preaching about this because the thread runs through the Old Testament readings, which are generally neglected unless they directly connect to the gospel.

    Perhaps if we did have vigorous preaching on the various aspects of covenant throughout Lent, once every three years, we would not draw such a blank when it came to the application of this idea to our common life. Unfortunately, we do draw a blank for the most part, because the idea of covenant is just never preached in Catholic churches.


by

Discover more from Home

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading