Liturgy in Collegeville: From the Archives

Pray Tell is introducing a new series on the liturgical history of Collegeville. The sub-series “From the Archives” will reprint some of the Liturgy Committee meeting minutes from 1963 to 1969. This sub-series is a behind-the-scenes look at liturgy in Collegeville during and immediately after the Second Vatican Council.

The first entry in the Calendar of Events:

August 1, 1962: The old Church is being turned into a Reception Center, containing the Porter’s Office, telephone booths, and general visiting areas. All of the paintings were removed. The apse wall was not disturbed leaving the beautiful picture of the Christ and the adoring angels intact. This was the work of Bro. Clement Frischauf, O.S.B.

Great Hall Apse

The first record from the Liturgy Committee:

Minutes of the Liturgy Committee

Sept. 9, 1963

Present were Father Abbot, Fathers John (chairman of the committee), Daniel, Godfrey, Michael, Gerard, Camillus, Wenceslaus, Leon, Fr. Adam, and Bro. Gerard.

After a brief explanation of the purpose of the committee by Father Abbot, Father John discussed the opening Mass for Sept. 12, which was to be the conventual Mass at which the clerics could receive communion with the students. The suggested form of the Mass was favorably received by the committee.

The question of the Mass for Sept. 15, the Sunday commemorating Father Godfrey’s silver jubilee as editor of Worship, was discussed. Father Godfrey suggested that the form of Mass be that of the “missa cum deacono,” a form still preserved in the Benedictine monasteries such as Maria Laach. This form of Mass would allow the readings of the Mass to be in English, besides Latin. Father Wenceslaus suggested that for fuller participation in the Mass on the part of the students, a student be chosen to read the Epistle of the Mass; a similar practice is common in Europe. Father Camillus and Father Daniel agreed that this should aid fuller student participation (Father Daniel: “Get the football players involved!”).

The possibility of a commentator was also discussed. Father Camillus preferred that the use of a commentator be rare, to which Father Godfrey agreed.

A topic to which must [sic] discussion was given was the entrance procession. Some felt that the Introit could be shortened by singing the Introit Antiphon, when it was repeated at the end of the Introit, on a Psalm tone. However, Father Gerard insisted that this would destroy the purity of the musical form, and his view won general support, although other viewpoints had been presented by Fathers Godfrey and Michael. To shorten the time of the entrance procession it was agreed that the Brothers, Novices, and Philosophers of the Clericate form Statio at 10:40 am around the choir stalls, with the Theologians of the Clericate and the Fathers to form Statio in the corridor leading into Church. At the first stroke of the clock for 10:45 all were to move.

It was decided not to use incense at this Mass in order to keep the form of this Mass as simple as possible. In regard to the Sanctus, Father Godfrey suggested that the one chosen be short and simple so that the celebrant could sing it with the people and then begin the “Te Igitur” after its singing was completed. For the recitation of the “Domine non sum dignus” it was considered that a compromise was necessary here, i.e., that one pause be made in the recitation of this prayer, since the students had been making two pauses, the community none. Further details in the arrangement of the Mass and schedule were left to Father John.

In the course of the meeting Father Godfrey had insisted, and all had agreed, that we should not be tied down to one form of community Mass on Sundays. Fr. Adam suggested that we have a solemnized Low Mass occasionally.”

Nathan Chase

Nathan P. Chase is Assistant Professor of Liturgical and Sacramental Theology at Aquinas Institute of Theology in St. Louis, MO. He has contributed a number of articles to the field of liturgical studies, including pieces on liturgy in the early Church, initiation, the Eucharist, inculturation, and the Western Non-Roman Rites, in particular the Hispano-Mozarabic tradition. His first book The Homiliae Toletanae and the Theology of Lent and Easter was published in 2020. His second monograph, published in 2023, is titled The Anaphoral Tradition in the ‘Barcelona Papyrus.’

Please leave a reply.

Comments

8 responses to “Liturgy in Collegeville: From the Archives”

  1. Scott Knitter

    This is fascinating…thank you for starting this series, and I look forward to the future installments!

  2. Brian Palmer

    What a wonderful idea. I too look forward to reading what the liturgists of the day had to say.

  3. Peter Kwasniewski

    “Domine non sum dingus”: Lord, I’m not a ding-dong.

    (Dynamic equivalence or literal?)

    This is a fascinating set of minutes. I was struck by these lines: “Some felt that the Introit could be shortened … It was decided not to use incense at this Mass in order to keep the form of this Mass as simple as possible …” This is the kind of attitude that has led to a stripped-down low Mass with the four-hymn sandwich as the (unlegislated) norm everywhere in the Church.

    “Father Gerard insisted that this would destroy the purity of the musical form.” I’m glad someone at that meeting was animated by the original Liturgical Movement vision.

    1. Nathan Chase

      @Peter Kwasniewski – comment #3:
      I noticed my typo in the Latin and have corrected it. I think Word auto-corrected it when I was typing out the letter. Very funny comment though.

  4. Brian Culley

    I agree. This is a very interesting look into our recent past which has quickly been forgotten. I look forward to reading more!

  5. Hilary Thimmesh, OSB

    Don’t miss the significance of Godfrey’s suggestion that the celebrant sing the Sanctus rather than begin the canon, Te igitur clementissime Pater, while the Sanctus was being sung. Godfrey’s comment implies the opposite practice, that the celebrant got on with addressing God confidentially in Latin while the choir did its thing and folks in the pews had devout thoughts while awaiting the elevation of the Host and Chalice, consecrated by the priest bending over them and uttering the sacred words in secret.

  6. Brian Culley

    Do you notice how clerical they were then? First the Abbot, then the Fathers – both with their full tittles, then one Fr., I guess frater for a seminarian, and last a Bro., neither with their title spelled out.

  7. Ellen Joyce

    This is glorious. The notion that Godfrey’s 25th anniversary as editor served to involve the football players … I can imagine his delight!


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Discover more from PrayTellBlog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading